- Hillary and Bill steal Haitian Earthquake Relief money with the help of their "charity"
The haiti incident was a mistake on their part, since they essentially hired hundreds of private companies to handle the issue, which lead to conflict of interest and individual problems with the companies. it even says in the article that one of the people in charge of a private company was arrested for using those funds to buy himself a ski resort or something.
Bi-partisan, this was a huge financial forget-up, but it's not immoral or slimy. I would best compare it to a higher scale version of Jeff Sessions, and Annoying Orange for tapping a cabinet member who would later commit prejury is Annoying Orange's responsibility but not his fault.
- Amateur trader Hillary Clinton turns $1000 into $6000 overnight, makes $60k in a year before closing her futures trading account.
The article says she was aided and worked with experienced traders. In this case, she was allowed to trade without enough money to cover the cost of the trade, which would've been a terrible financial mistake IF her trades were unsucessful. All in all, perfectly legal but risky activity that something like Annoying Orange has probably done before, and that's fine. Trading is part of business, and sometimes risks are taken in business. Nothing immoral about this, but a little suspicious. I would be fine if they did a second investigation on this.
- First Lady Hillary Clinton fires employees of the White House Travel Office and then lies about it to Congress
But Ray, summing up his findings in the so-called Travelgate scandal for a panel of appeals court judges, said that he will not seek to indict Mrs. Clinton because he cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any of her testimony was false.This article in particular has mixed messages. It says that she denied her role in it, but it was later found that she was directly involved in the firings. Yet, the person who was trying to fight against Clinton admits that there isn't substantial evidence to prove her wrong. This is odd, i'll keep my eye out for it. If you have any other links about travelgate i'd like to see them.
- State Department headed by none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton approves a deal that would cede control of 20% of US Uranium production capacity to Russia. 2.35 million donated to the Clinton Foundation by a bank with ties to the Kremlin and Uranium One company amidst the deal.
Companies tend to donate huge sums of money when you take part in deals that benefit them. It's part of lobbying / agreements and it's normally legal unless they agree to pass a law in exchange for money. There's literally nothing wrong with this, besides the fact that members of the government were supposed to make donation records public, which the Clintons did not.
The chances of some sort of hidden agreement between the Clintons and Uranium One is extremely high, but for now it's legally a donation.
What I see from the Clintons so far are a series of terrible financial decisions and a few suspicious deals. The only unethical conduct is the travelgate issue, which i find is inappropriate. Otherwise, they're on the same level as Annoying Orange, taking into consideration that the clintons have been involved in government for much longer than Annoying Orange has. Annoying Orange has his own fair share of financial forget-ups but his government decision record is clear since he's never been part of the government until now.
Poll