Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2886382 times)

now you're walking into white supremacist territory

It's getting into the ws territory when he starts saying being white and being western is the same thing

implying that you can't become any of those
doesnt work mate

a poor populace is necessary for society to function

theres little ways around it

there always has to be someone to get the shaft

implying you can't become any of these [<or something he edited this]
do you understand how difficult it is to move upwards from the lower class?

It's getting into the ws territory when he starts saying being white and being western is the same thing
yeah it's not strictly white supremacy, but the notion that western culture is being tainted by outsiders (which necessarily requires claiming western culture is objectively superior) is something that a lot of people find questionable, because it heavily implies real xenophobia, and it can be especially dangerous when placed in the context of desiring government intervention

is this firing of james comey alternatively related to that "hillary's e-mails" trend/bandwagon/meme/thing where he wouldn't make charges to hillary clinton because he doesn't think hillary committed a crime yet it's been somehow "proven" what she did is illegal? and that last part alone isn't sarcastic, i'm not actually sure if it was proven or not that the hillary's e-mails was an illegal act.

is this firing of james comey alternatively related to that "hillary's e-mails" trend/bandwagon/meme/thing where he wouldn't make charges to hillary clinton because he doesn't think hillary committed a crime yet it's been somehow "proven" what she did is illegal? and that last part alone isn't sarcastic, i'm not actually sure if it was proven or not that the hillary's e-mails was an illegal act.
It's related inthat Donald et al. didn't like that he announced there would be no charges pressed against her. It wasn't about the fact that there were going to be no charges, it was about the fact that he announced it on TV. As far as I know if they did manage to actually prove in a court of law that she did what she's been accused of, she would be sentenced but proving the particular charges in a court of law is a lot more difficult than just saying "she had classified emails." My guess is that they just didn't have enough evidence to make a solid case, and so announced that there would be no charges.

is this firing of james comey alternatively related to that "hillary's e-mails" trend/bandwagon/meme/thing where he wouldn't make charges to hillary clinton because he doesn't think hillary committed a crime yet it's been somehow "proven" what she did is illegal? and that last part alone isn't sarcastic, i'm not actually sure if it was proven or not that the hillary's e-mails was an illegal act.
The fact that Hillary broke the law was proven. The reason Comey claims he wouldn't prosecute her was that he believed she didn't "intend" to break the law. Which is stupid.

Negligent behavior that violates federal law is still a crime, even if Hillary didn't mean to violate the law, as comey claims.

spending money on letting refugees into your country seems like a waste to me; the money could be better spend on improving their country and ending government corruption & creating lasting peace in their home region.
ur a good man

People who question how Sanders' economic plans would work are the same people who aren't hesitant about Annoying Orange spending tens of billions of dollars to build a dumb, useless border wall and certainly don't care about the $600 billion we spend annually on our military to build fighter jets and tanks that don't do anything.

Nope, we can't spend all this money on education, job growth, the environment, infrastructure, but we sure as hell can go for walls and endless war.

People who question how Sanders' economic plans would work are the same people who aren't hesitant about Annoying Orange spending tens of billions of dollars to build a dumb, useless border wall and certainly don't care about the $600 billion we spend annually on our military to build fighter jets and tanks that don't do anything.

Nope, we can't spend all this money on education, job growth, the environment, infrastructure, but we sure as hell can go for walls and endless war.

"My plans may not work but at least they aren't yours!"
« Last Edit: May 11, 2017, 09:11:48 PM by Red Spy »

"The plans may not work but at least it isn't yours!"
what's the problem with this

The fact that Hillary broke the law was proven. The reason Comey claims he wouldn't prosecute her was that he believed she didn't "intend" to break the law. Which is stupid.

Negligent behavior that violates federal law is still a crime, even if Hillary didn't mean to violate the law, as comey claims.

i see.

It's related inthat Donald et al. didn't like that he announced there would be no charges pressed against her. It wasn't about the fact that there were going to be no charges, it was about the fact that he announced it on TV. As far as I know if they did manage to actually prove in a court of law that she did what she's been accused of, she would be sentenced but proving the particular charges in a court of law is a lot more difficult than just saying "she had classified emails." My guess is that they just didn't have enough evidence to make a solid case, and so announced that there would be no charges.

now my only question is if the replacement of the FBI director is going to make a final conclusion/do more effort on finding more evidence, if there is anymore left of course, of this situation in the job.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2017, 09:11:25 PM by Timestamp »


"My plans may not work but at least they aren't yours!"

Yeah all that military intervention in the Middle East has really done a lot of good right

Yeah all that military intervention in the Middle East has really done a lot of good right
terrorism has practically disappeared!!!!!