are you kidding me
literally all their articles do is explain and prove why others' claims are wrong (or right)
that's the entire purpose
you've managed to tell a lie so stupid that it isn't just untrue, it's anti-true
if you hadn't noticed, I italicized the "
they"
that's referring to
snopes believe it or not
ah yes
one dude on youtube called snopes propaganda, that means it must be true
I could list about two more people, but I won't because you've got your richard jammed so far up Snopes's ass that it wouldn't matter
jesus loving christ dude try an ounce of effort
I'm not going to watch a 10 minute rant from some nutter on youtube lol. summarize it.
sorry I thought you'd have a little bit of effort in you to be able to actually watch the source and respond to the information he's providing
guess not
looks like you're just here to throw around names as "good people" and "bad people" like everyone else
I mean, let me summarize the last couple of pages here
- I provide a claim
- You question the claim, asking for evidence
- I provide sources
- You attack the sources and say they aren't good enough, suggesting I pull from your hand-picked pool of selected sources
- I provide MORE sources, this time from more reputable places
- You refute the sources again and tell me to pull from those same sources again
- I play your game and when you pull a source that isn't reputable I attack the source
- All hell breaks loose as you all hypocritically go nuts because I attacked your source
- I provide evidence for this claim with another source
- You all unironically go back to attacking my source for your stuffty source for my source
- The conversation becomes a cesspool of "he said, she said source source sOURCE SOURCE SOURCE" and nothing is actually refuted
- (yet to happen) We all get mad and start flaming each other
and BTW, if you want me to brown townyze your source, Frankfurt is not Cologne
a five-second google search would've shown that
Poll