Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2989078 times)

leave it up to leisure to construe a sarcastic retort as an admittance to fascism

Manlets tend to be short sited.

leave it up to leisure to construe a sarcastic retort as an admittance to fascism

lmao


Annoying Orange says Pence wants to hang all the gays
Nice!

"153 suspects"

"yeah well there weren't as many incidents as suspects they committed multiple crimes"

"612 reported love incidents"

"SO WHAT"

k
"There weren't that many incidents as suspects / they committed multiple crimes" are two contradictory statements. If the same person commits multiple crimes there will be more crimes than suspects (That's actually what happened here). He was saying that there can be multiple people involved in the same crime, which is true but isn't proven or disproven by the amount of reported love incidents

all in all, ???

Snopes went bankrupt when their slander finally caught up to them and ended up getting sued. Now the only way they can stay in business is by making up stuff for their liberal sponsors. Snopes is nice if I want to look up internet stories about draino bombs and the Kraken, but I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole for anything political. Seriously, even politicuck is more credible in that area than snopes.
>"Hillary and the DNC are hiding child love slaves inside a pizza parlor"
>snopes: "There's no evidence for that, and there's significant evidence showing that's not true, such as this[1], that[2], and this[3]"
>"Wow, Snopes is a totally unreliable liberal lie-factory"

"There weren't that many incidents as suspects / they committed multiple crimes" are two contradictory statements. If the same person commits multiple crimes there will be more crimes than suspects (That's actually what happened here). He was saying that there can be multiple people involved in the same crime, which is true but isn't proven or disproven by the amount of reported love incidents

all in all, ???
my original point was actually that multiple people can be suspected of the same crime, even if only one of the suspects committed it
of course when it actually comes time to prosecute they're going to narrow it down

>"Hillary and the DNC are hiding child love slaves inside a pizza parlor"

This isn't real politics, this might as well be the same thing as draino bombs and the Kraken

Also < implying they weren't

This isn't real politics, this might as well be the same thing as draino bombs and the Kraken
What's the gripe against Snopes articles on 'real politics'? It's not like they are more inclined to rate something as 'mixed or false' just because it targets liberals. If they were gunning for the 'liberal agenda', why does this article exist?

http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/nugent.asp

Ted Nugent has gone on record bragging about dodging the draft, and only recently did he recant it after getting involved in conservative politics. Yet Snopes gives him the benefit of the doubt and lists it as 'unproven'.

Bros, it's not a lie if the majority of it is truth

Bros, it's not a lie if the majority of it is truth
I don't follow?

funny how people accused me and kearn of using isolated incidents and such talking about rape gangs meanwhile seventh uses only one single article of snopes being pro-conservative to validate their entire platform and nobody says anything

I mean what were you expecting? Stratified samples and t-tests? What level of rigor do you want?

I mean what were you expecting? Stratified samples and t-tests? What level of rigor do you want?

you could provide the amount of republican/conservative claims proven false versus the amount of leftist claims proven false, but that'd disprove your argument if you could even get it (I don't know if you can or not)