And why should we listen to you on this? Why is YOUR insight more trustworthy than mega bear's or ipquarx's?
This post amounts to "You're wrong and stupid for saying this" and not much else.
You don't have to believe me, because I haven't made any claim other than I don't believe it. It's not my job to prove a negative, lol. Until they give me proof that Russia "hacked" or even so much as "influenced" the election it's total bullstuff. I see these handicaps trying to say POKEMON GO was involved. Do you know how handicapped they sound?
Intelligence agencies aren't always truthful (that much was clear from the Snowden leaks), but they're the best authority we have on intelligence matters. I'm much more inclined to believe the CIA than some deep-state conspitribal on matters of national intelligence.
And if there was really no evidence, why would there be SEVERAL Congressional investigations that involve the matter, a Justice Department investigation, and e-mails leaked from the Annoying Orange campaign that show evidence of contact?
Several month long investigations that have turned up...? And what does that even mean, contact? Contact =/= collusion to usurp our democracy
That's the problem, all these hacks just use these vague concepts to try to steer the narrative in their direction
We went from russian hacking to russian collusion to simply russian influence. That's total bullstuff. We went from something that would be an act of war to "influence", something they are not only unable to prove but so common even the US does it on a regular basis without any repercussions. What's really funny is they're basically claiming Russia released factual info on Clinton, so she lost. I mean, loving come on.