Author Topic: Real Talk: What should the world do about terrorism (CIA, etc.)? [Organized OP]  (Read 44490 times)

new real talk: gay edition

I didn't think it was

let me get home and edit it.

don't blf and drive
i do it all the time

sometimes I just wish I'll not pay attention and god to just take me quickly. boom. there i go

no homoloveuality is a disease and a sin

People turn gay at age of 60

People turn gay at age of 60

people turn into paedophiles at that age too



Orientation is determined at birth as much as someone's favorite food is, because it's just that: a loveual preference.

if you relived your exact same life, same body, ect but they all went in different directions being good or bad I don't think you would be 100% gay in all realities

and I highly doubt your preference on food would too
« Last Edit: March 09, 2016, 06:52:09 PM by Trogtor »

my richard was inside a vagina before I was even born

ur mum is determined from birth...

attraction is mostly gene based, but it's debated whether or not attraction can be learned (although you generally won't learn to become gay in the west. unless you spend time on tumblr)

the debate in attraction lies within tits, actually. lots of tribal societies allow them to hang out freely on both genders and all the guys have flaccid dongers but in the west, obviously, showing them in public is practically as taboo as showing your genitals in public because those in the west attracted to women, well, see them as loveually attractive.

the question is, have these tribes learned to ignore the boob or have we learned to notice the boob?

Orientation is determined at birth as much as someone's favorite food is, because it's just that: a loveual preference.
the problem i have with this is that there's not really any scientific evidence that loveual orientation can change afaik. that's part of why ex-gay therapy is criticised by medical institutions and considered pesudoscience. if it were just a preference you would expect that it could change at any given point.

(some reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loveual_orientation_change_efforts)

attraction is mostly gene based, but it's debated whether or not attraction can be learned (although you generally won't learn to become gay in the west. unless you spend time on tumblr)

the debate in attraction lies within tits, actually. lots of tribal societies allow them to hang out freely on both genders and all the guys have flaccid dongers but in the west, obviously, showing them in public is practically as taboo as showing your genitals in public because those in the west attracted to women, well, see them as loveually attractive.

the question is, have these tribes learned to ignore the boob or have we learned to notice the boob?
i think there's definitely a degree of learned behaviour as far as attraction goes, or as far as what kind of things are loveually appealing (case in point: special interestes), but i don't think this extends to loveual orientation

Orientation is determined at birth as much as someone's favorite food is, because it's just that: a loveual preference.
yeah, i think so too. as you get older it usually just develops as well. and anyway, when you're a toddler you don't really give a stuff about loveuality or love or anything like that.