Real Talk: What should the world do about terrorism (CIA, etc.)? [Organized OP]

[XR-7]

1.) What if they find someone guilty, kill him, then a couple years later they found a different guy.

Then we can send an apology note to the first guy's family and then kill the second guy

[Ad Bot]

[KickFlow]

oh ok

[Lord Tony®]

Why not give convicts the choice to go on deathrow, if they're so bored and fed up with prison? Isn't that better than sending them to their death without their consent or say?

Their victims didn't have consent or say on being murdered.

[PhantOS]

Their victims didn't have consent or say on being murdered.

So two wrongs make a right

[Lord Tony®]

So two wrongs make a right

One murder? No death penalty, 25 years minimum to possible life.

Two murders? Life+

Three murders? Life++

Four murders? Life+++

ten or more murders. Not the clean kill shooting murders but the kind where you beat someone to death with a hammer or eat their eyeballs out while they are alive? Death


Give or take depending on state laws but the last one deserves death. There is zero chance for reform.

[Daswiruch]

commit multiple murders, waste tax dollars

[bestguy22]

instead of death penalty we should just do public humiliation ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[ZSNO]

the wrong-ness of ethnocentrism

Let's say I think ethnocentrism is morally correct. Why is your opinion that it's morally incorrect true while my opinion is incorrect?
Morals are just opinions yo

[Lord Tony®]

Jeffrey Dahmer was sentenced to 15 life sentences. He should have been sent to death, his fellow inmate killed him though, he should be a hero.

One thing I don't understand is the fact they keep adding life sentences like it will do anything.

So 1 life sentence is basically till he's dead. what does an added on 14 do? Nothing. It's not like he is going to live through the first life sentence and you can't jail his ghost.

[ZSNO]

Multiple life sentences are so that if any of them are overturned, there are still more.

[Lord Tony®]

Multiple life sentences are so that if any of them are overturned, there are still more.

I doubt Dahmer would be able to overturn a life sentence on kidnapping, raping, torturning, killing, necrophilia and cannibalism.

[Phoople]

Nope.

[Lord Tony®]

What's more insulting is that the guy that killed Dahmer received a higher prison sentence. That guy is a hero.

When it was lunchtime Dahmer was talking about how the food reminded him of eating people. I doubt prison was going to reform him anyways.

[Marios]

instead of death penalty we should just do public humiliation ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

what if the guy never cared about his rep anyway ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[log]

Let's say I think ethnocentrism is morally correct. Why is your opinion that it's morally incorrect true while my opinion is incorrect?
Morals are just opinions yo

Let's say I think moral relativism is morally correct. Oh wait, I can't. Because moral relativism says that morals are opinions, so technically my own moral stance that morals are relevant to the individual is also an opinion. I'm neither correct nor incorrect, but I'll still teach this standpoint in my philosophy class because ethnocentrism isn't pollitically correct, and just saying women shouldn't be able to kill their young or that african tribes shouldn't practice female circumcision is clearly the wrong thing here.

People are perfect, clearly, so why would we need to impose our morality on them? Why are we so intolerant of other people's opnions or ways of life? We're too righteous and judgemental. Morality is a private affair. We should keep our nose out of other people's business.