King of page X

[Lord Tony®]

Can we all just stop this fad already? It disrupts and de-rails topics. All of these posts were taken from just 1 thread, multiple posts in a row of just this.

King of page x

king of page 30

Duke of page 30

Dunce of page 30

Prince of page 30

it's ok, you can be the supreme dictator of page 30

The love slave of 30

fish of page 31

King of some thread

Queen of page 30.

cook of 30

roosterchip of 30

First of page 31

[Ad Bot]

[Marios]

/support

Does nothing but clutter pages with useless crap, otherwise known as 'stuffposts.'

[Refticus]

king of page 1 because nobody took it

but to be honest here, i see no problem with it if it doesn't become a chain (queen, duke, janitor and etc), it should be a one off thing for thread milestones of 100 and 1000 pages for example, not for every 10 pages.

[Space1255]

King of page 1
I kind of understand where you're coming from with this, especially if the people had nothing to do with the discussion on hand in the threads.

[TableSalt]

That first quote was not to be the king of the page, if you'd actually bother to read the thread.

[Lord Tony®]

That first quote was not to be the king of the page, if you'd actually bother to read the thread.

Declaring you aren't the king of a page for someone else to claim it is the exact same thing.

It's still a stuffpost.

[Lord Tony®]

It's actually worse because when your first post of the page is say "hey I'm not the king of this page, who wants to claim it" then you get a stuff ton of people fighting for the king title and then it ends up in over 13 posts of just that.

if you'd actually bother to read the thread.

I like reading threads when they are on topic not when they spew into this.

[TableSalt]

Declaring you aren't the king of a page for someone else to claim it is the exact same thing.

It's still a stuffpost.

[Refticus]

It's actually worse because when your first post of the page is say "hey I'm not the king of this page, who wants to claim it" then you get a stuff ton of people fighting for the king title and then it ends up in over 13 posts of just that.

I like reading threads when they are on topic not when they spew into this.

but surely a simple "king of page 666!" will not ruin your viewing experience.

also tablesalt made his post in the "things that people do on the blf that you hate" thread, meaning it was probably ironic or to show that he dislikes the kinging fad.

[Lord Tony®]

Alright so the first post I quoted happened to be coincidentally the first post of page 30 but he was probably complaining about people who do that king of page stuff.

Fine you got a point there.

The other 12 posts after that stuff are not on topic with the actual thread.

[Col. Burton]

I think its ok for the high pages like 1000 and 1500

[Donnies Catch]

its the same as people that comment first on anything ever. imo its dumb

[Mr Queeba]

It's OK for page milestones like 100, 666, 1000, 1337, etc in my opinion.

[ABlockOfCheese]

imo its fine for page number milestones, but not for just every random page

[MoltenKitten]

/support

It adds nothing to discussion and is therefore spam.