Poll

It is, but it do.

Yes, the U.S should take in refugees.
No, the U.S should not take in refugees

Author Topic: Should the U.S take in any refugees from the Middle East?  (Read 3125 times)

I'm all for temporary asylum but long term integration is really difficult to work out

lets build a bridge between syria and the us
whoever walks it gets to stay in the us
no food, drink or water allowed



yes, in body bags
why would we bring dead syrian migrants to the US in the first place. would make no sense. just give them a proper sea burial (an islamic custom iirc).

let them live with rape special interestists

Refugees aren't weak and fragile as you think. One country took in refugees and the rape statistic in that country increased by 300%.


Maybe we should let them into the US, and force the people calling for their admittance to live with these refugees. Let's see how that goes and see how those pro-refugee people think of it after a month, or even a week. I'm willing to bet they will deeply regret it.

Nope. Most of those people that would be coming into our country would be Muslim extremists. Americans should stop viewing Islamic extremism through the lens of political correctness.
Your opinion is inaccurate and incredibly ignorant.

I will only accept docile, willing to temporarily stay-but-not-citizens-as-they-aren't-immigrants Syrian FAMILIES (including women and children (not teens coming alone)) into this country who are vetted to make sure they don't have relations with extremism. Muslims are ok. People who want to kill my way of living who are muslim are not ok.

People who are not Syrian and are economic refugees/trying to take advantage of our hospitality will be sent on a cargo ship back home.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2016, 01:21:22 AM by Swat 3 »

People who are not Syrian and are economic refugees/trying to take advantage of our hospitality will be sent on a cargo ship back home.
You know there are more wars in Africa and the Middle East than just the Syrian CrCIA, right? The African refugees pouring into Europe are also fleeing from violence in their homelands. Mali, Libia, Egypt, Sudan, all hotbeds of cruel and pointless violence that people need to escape from.

Anyway I don't think we should take in refugees. It would cost more than they would bring into the economy and I really don't see what good it will bring the US. I don't know the best solution here, but it should benefit more people than the refugees.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2016, 07:18:20 AM by Taciturn »

Have we reached a consensus

I'm all for temporary asylum but long term integration is really difficult to work out

Basically. There has been case over case of refugees refusing to integrate into societies, causing far more problems than good.

Basically. There has been case over case of refugees refusing to integrate into societies, causing far more problems than good.
Could totally put strikes on them if they misbehave and a certain amount of strikes would mean deportation. >w>

good incentive to not do bad things yah

Nope. Most of those people that would be coming into our country would be Muslim extremists. Americans should stop viewing Islamic extremism through the lens of political correctness.
Because every Muslim in the Middle East is an extremist, amirite?