Author Topic: Harriet Tubman will be on the $20 bill-- $10 and $5 bills changing, too  (Read 13995 times)

hold on for a moment in your life and realize you're defending andrew jackson

hold on for a moment in your life and realize you're defending andrew jackson
there's a time and a place to defend andrew jackson, but this isn't one of them


I'm pretty indifferent to this tbh, MLK would've been a better choice imo (as above just stated).

and with the surplus funds acquired from paying off the debt, he caused a housing market bubble to burst and drove the country into rampant inflation and recession.
well a debt crCIA is alright if you're partial to a crippling economic recession
the battle of new orleans was after the war of 1812

News of the Treaty of Ghent didn't arrive to Andrew Jackson or the rest of the men he was commanding and hostilities continued for a year even after the war had "officially ended". His troops were greatly outnumbered and his victory was nothing short of him being an excellent leader which is one of the reasons why he was elected as president in the first place. And many of the financial panics prior to this engagement were caused by the Second National Bank's policies such as the Panic of 1819. The inflationary policies of the Second National Bank was the reason there was a vast support of abolishing it. Also, blaming Jackson solely for the economic crCIA ridiculous it was caused for a number of reasons such as political instability in Mexico which caused  inflation-driven exports of silver, the payment of war reparations, the reduction of silver flow to China. The panic of 1837 would have happened regardless of Jackson's abolishing the Second National Bank

And I'm not defending Andrew Jackson's removal of Native American's I'm defending his distrust of large centralized bank and "big government" as you would call it.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2016, 06:09:38 PM by Psych36 »

clownfish on the 20$ bill lets go bitches

sounds like a plan to me


the fuccin liberal agenda

The only reason it's not MLK because they were pressured to put more women on the money.

is that second picture in the OP a mock-up of what it might look like or is that really what it's gonna look like? cause that stuff's ugly. not as bad as the word-art 100 dollar bills, but close

is that second picture in the OP a mock-up of what it might look like or is that really what it's gonna look like? cause that stuff's ugly. not as bad as the word-art 100 dollar bills, but close
i'm not sure, sorry.

As an anti-change enthusiast i am Pist off to say the least... as a true American i am greatful to see our economy expand none the less

damn feminational socialists are going after our money now

i'm guessing the picture in the OP is just a photoshop mock-up

is that second picture in the OP a mock-up of what it might look like or is that really what it's gonna look like? cause that stuff's ugly. not as bad as the word-art 100 dollar bills, but close
obviously a mock-up. You can see remnants of Jackson's hair still under the eagle