Author Topic: starfish kills good fish and justice is served  (Read 5117 times)

that's not a fair brown townogy; that implies that a guy killing a fish in my lake will affect me (it won't)
It would if you fish in the same river as him, which those guys were.

for arguing with him and posting it online? yeah, they are.

why do we even have court trials like just jail them and move on no need for a confrontation

why do we even have court trials like just jail them and move on no need for a confrontation
Yeah and all criminals, including loveual predors should be kept anonymous. No need to raise awareness of their acts.

I bet Nonnel would use the "so is smoking pot" excuse too.

It would if you fish in the same river as him, which those guys were.
god, a whole fish! now i'll have to catch one of the other hundreds of fish in the lake!

why do we even have court trials like just jail them and move on no need for a confrontation
civilians can't just throw each other in jail so that makes no sense. him making out his case to them would make no difference whereas in court it does.

Yeah and all criminals, including loveual predors should be kept anonymous. No need to raise awareness of their acts.
these brown townogies are making less and less sense

nonnel i bet if you got decked in the head you wouldn't do anything besides walk away and "report" it

nonnel i bet if you got decked in the head you wouldn't do anything besides walk away and "report" it
that would actually affect me so why wouldn't i

god, a whole fish! now i'll have to catch one of the other hundreds of fish in the lake!
I've already explained the flaw in this argument, you're running in circles. This isn't an incident that can be isolated.
The constant cumulation of ignorance by people like the ones in the video is what causes population issues and hunting/fishing regulations in the first place.
and at that point I doubt they cared about catching fish, but rather the issue I presented in that quote.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2016, 08:55:07 PM by Ravencroft· »

that would actually affect me so why wouldn't i

so you're saying you would do something because it affects you?

or are you saying you would report it?  because you made it pretty clear that you're going to report it anyway

I've already explained the flaw in this argument, you're running in circles. This isn't an incident that can be isolated.
so report it whenever you see it

so you're saying you would do something because it affects you?
or are you saying you would report it?  because you made it pretty clear that you're going to report it anyway
i'd do something
seriously you're really thick-skulled

seriously you're really thick-skulled
nice autobiography

i'd do something
seriously you're really thick-skulled

this issue clearly directly effects the fishers that confront him, and they did something about it

do you really want to be calling me thick-skulled when you defused your own argument

it doesn't affect them is what you don't seem to be getting

it doesn't affect them is what you don't seem to be getting

please explain to me how it doesn't affect them

i guess if im drinking a drink and someone spills a little bit of it for no reason it doesn't directly affect me

please explain to me how it doesn't affect them
because there are a thousand other fish to catch in that lake. if not there, they can go to one of the other couple thousand lakes in canada.
reporting the guy is the most they can do. arguing with him and posting it online because he killed the fish they wanted to catch and throw back ( :( those poor guys) isn't going to solve anything that the justice system can't.