starfish kills good fish and justice is served

[Neventii]

he killed a musky and tossed it in the water because it was eating all the other fish he wanted to catch

Oh good for him now he can catch fish

Did we really do nine pages over a fish?

That guy in the boat is a little bitch why do low test men exist "I'm gonna report you to the C.O", it's like back when i played call of duty

[Ad Bot]

[Red Spy]

It's literately just one loving fish

[shitlord]

It's literately just one loving fish

and its illegal, cruel, and stupid

[shitlord]

i wasn't even talking about the reaction picture ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
you didn't diffuse the points, you disregarded them.

show me where i disregarded a point

[Nonnel]

yeah okay nonnel, because everyone is the same

point: this guy is probably more annoyed that people are bugging him than regretful that he killed a fish
counterpoint: why do you think you know how people act!!!

because this is guaranteed re-population

point: even in the (NOTE: ridiculous) case that the guy fished and killed the last musky in the lake, the lake could still be repopulated by unnatural/human ways
counterpoint: yeah well what if they all die again??

why do we even have court trials like just jail them and move on no need for a confrontation

point: they are starfishs because they're arguing with someone for no good reason then posting their private argument online for people to see
counterpoint: so what you're saying is we should throw him in jail

this issue clearly directly effects the fishers that confront him, and they did something about it

point: if someone attacked me, i would fight back
counterpoint: so that means that the fishers were directly effected

please explain to me how it doesn't affect them

i guess if im drinking a drink and someone spills a little bit of it for no reason it doesn't directly affect me

point: the guy killing one fish in a lake does not affect other people fishing in the lake.
counterpoint: oh so if someone punches me in the face it doesn't affect me right?

no, they confronted him because they wanted to know why the forget he did that

point: the two guys went over to argue with the guy
counterpoint: the two guys went over to argue with the guy

so even though these guys killed a fish that is crucial for the ecosystem and food chain its okay cause they can just go to another lake

also its okay because there's apparently a thousand other of that specific fish in that lake (there aren't)

point: there are hundreds of fish in the lake
counterpoint: oh so there are hundreds of muskies in the lake???

point: even if there WEREN'T hundreds of fish in that lake, they could go to another lake
counterpoint: oh so because musky man killed a fish, the whole lake died, but that's ok because there are more lakes??????????


answering statements with questions, bad brown townogies, and wrong conclusions is not diffusing points, it's disregarding the point entirely so you can skew the statement.

[SinnerOG]

forget that guy. It isn't just one fish because obviously he does it every time he catches a muskie. I guess it is true that you appreciate wildlife more as a hunter/fisherman. I don't understand why anyone is defending this guy. It's one thing if he kept the fish, but he just wasted it. But, I wouldn't expect any less from the BLF, so.

[Zloff]

majority of blf probably doesn't even step outside willingly

[Maxwell.]

I stepped outside once, and that was the last time I ever did that stuff

[Clownfish]

hi blockchip

[Lego lad]

I stepped outside once, and that was the last time I ever did that stuff

did you die

[shitlord]

point: this guy is probably more annoyed that people are bugging him than regretful that he killed a fish
counterpoint: why do you think you know how people act!!!

how is this disregarding

point: even in the (NOTE: ridiculous) case that the guy fished and killed the last musky in the lake, the lake could still be repopulated by unnatural/human ways
counterpoint: yeah well what if they all die again??

did i say that they would die again
it would take more than two of them to loving repopulate

point: they are starfishs because they're arguing with someone for no good reason then posting their private argument online for people to see
counterpoint: so what you're saying is we should throw him in jail

...what?

point: if someone attacked me, i would fight back
counterpoint: so that means that the fishers were directly effected

what?

point: the guy killing one fish in a lake does not affect other people fishing in the lake.
counterpoint: oh so if someone punches me in the face it doesn't affect me right?

i cant even anymore

point: the two guys went over to argue with the guy
counterpoint: the two guys went over to argue with the guy

til asking a question is arguing

point: there are hundreds of fish in the lake
counterpoint: oh so there are hundreds of muskies in the lake???

this is loving astounding nonnel

point: even if there WEREN'T hundreds of fish in that lake, they could go to another lake
counterpoint: oh so because musky man killed a fish, the whole lake died, but that's ok because there are more lakes??????????

this isnt even disregarding, it literally defused your arugment

answering statements with questions, bad brown townogies, and wrong conclusions is not diffusing points, it's disregarding the point entirely so you can skew the statement.

most of your examples of me "disregarding" posts can be answered with this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMHqUzmjbJw

you're just arguing to get the last word now

[Ravencroft·]

holy stuff it got worse

[plad101]

Oh good for him now he can catch fish

Did we really do nine pages over a fish?

That guy in the boat is a little bitch why do low test men exist "I'm gonna report you to the C.O", it's like back when i played call of duty

It's a fish that is in low population in that lake, it's illegal, cruel, and frowned upon by most fisherman.

It's like if you went out and shot a panda to most normal people.

[Nonnel]

how is this disregarding

this guy showed willful disregard for the fish's life and definitely would not have hesitated to kill more muskies if he'd just argued with some guys who posted him on the internet and never had to face any legal recourse
but you didn't actually think about how the guy acted and just assumed i thought i was omniscient. nice.

did i say that they would die again
it would take more than two of them to loving repopulate

if you put a male and a female fish of the same species in the water and they don't repopulate, they die out. so yes, you did say that.

...what?

my point was that arguing with people and posting it online was enough to justify getting called an starfish. you concluded from this that i think we should get rid of the justice system and throw everyone in jail. you made a wrong (and really stupid) conclusion and disregarded the actual point.

what?

i said that i would fight back if someone attacked me. you concluded from this that the fishers were affected by musky man (???)

i cant even anymore

literally how it's written. that's exactly the conclusion you made and i see you "can't even" make up any defense for your idiotic remarks anymore

til asking a question is arguing

you said it yourself, they went over to confront him. they obviously weren't expecting anything other than an argument

this is loving astounding nonnel

also literally the conclusion you made. i said there were plenty of other fish to catch and you retorted with "oh yeah so there are plenty of muskies??" that makes no sense. i didn't say that.

this isnt even disregarding, it literally defused your arugment

it didn't, though. like i said, throw some more muskies in the lake and there's no problem. if you don't want to do that, then just find another lake to fish musky in, there's literally no problem.

most of your examples of me "disregarding" posts can be answered with this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMHqUzmjbJw

you're just arguing to get the last word now

another "i'm superior so there"

[Frequency]

hi blockchip

wanting to address everything someone said in that format isn't uncommon or exclusive to blockchip. I've done it before blockchip was even a thing