Adam from YMS confirmed degenerate

[Clownfish]

So if someone sedates someone then rapes them it isn't rape because there was no resistance?

no because you can't rape somebody who consents by not resisting

[Ad Bot]

[MoltenKitten]

no because you can't rape somebody who consents by not resisting

Thanks for clearing that up, I have a court case and i'll be sure to bring this up.

[Clownfish]

Thanks for cleaning that up, I have a court case and i'll be sure to bring this up.

cosby was in the right!

[XR-7]

It's......happening......again.. ....

[Pastrey Crust]

So if someone sedates someone then rapes them it isn't rape because there was no resistance?

Drugging someone just to forget them is considered rape in any kind of case. You're consciously modifying their responses with psycotic drugs.

And since no one wants to make a reasonable debate, I will not reply anymore.

[MoltenKitten]

Drugging someone just to forget them is considered rape in any kind of case. You're consciously modifying their responses with psycotic drugs.

And since no one wants to make a reasonable debate, I will not reply anymore.

You're the one making the unreasonable debate but I guess we will take a different approach. What if a 6 year old child consents, is it rape or not?

[Maxwell.]

And since no one wants to make a reasonable debate, I will not reply anymore.

or because there's one obvious clear answer: it's a loving stupid issue to be defending

[sir dooble]

While true that bestiality can be rape/loveual abuse of the animal in question, it's not in every case. While verbal consent can't be given by the animal in question, physical consent can. If it voluntarily gives oral, there's no reason for it to be considered rape. Now entry can be a bit more complicated as it can be somewhat difficult to get into a comfortable position and more resistance can be offered by the animal.

If people would stop the blinding "cant give verbal consent" argument and actually think for a second on how they resist you taking their ball, the same applies to having love. If they don't want to, they will resist by turning their heads away, sitting down, getting away, or even attacking you in the most extreme cases. If she/he wants to, they won't resist. Otherwise, anyone can tell by just looking at them and immediately tell they're trying to get away.

You could probably get a baby to suck/lick a richard. Baby still can't consent, you're still a paedophile and a rapist.

Thanks for making me write this awful sentence.

[MoltenKitten]

The only possible physical consent is sign language.

[Clownfish]

And since no one wants to make a reasonable debate, I will not reply anymore.

you just loving said you supported love with animals you idiot what did you expect?
literally nobody can back up love with animals without looking like a handicap which you manage to do even if it's not loving animals related
you even used "it's not illegal" as an excuse for when you interjected on your dog

[MoltenKitten]

Everything is moral if it doesn't break laws! I'm gonna piss on the toilet seat!

[Drydess]

I'm gonna piss on the toilet seat!

YOU WOULD

[MoltenKitten]

YOU WOULD

Don't use that tone with me, it is legal

[Drydess]

Don't use that tone with me, it is legal

it's also legal to use that tone

[Nal]

how come every Adam I know is a gay furry