Author Topic: IGN's review of DOOM  (Read 9728 times)

what the hell are you going on aboutdid they even have computers back then
you guys do realize 99% of his posts are bait right
Now I do...

Didn't you just stuffpost about how you hate undertale?
>pointing out my opinion on a game rather than mentioning the fact that i made a thread for the entire point of stuffposting a few day sago

so doom worth 60$ yes or no?

so doom worth 60$ yes or no?
i'd wait honestly, last time i paid $60 for a singeplayer shooter was wolfenstein the new order (i'm assuming since people call the multiplayer boring, the singeplayer is what's going to be the main focus) and it was incredibly short and wasn't very tough even on the hard difficulty

so doom worth 60$ yes or no?

Not really, it's a meh reboot.

the last games i payed full price for was the last of us and fallout 4, and those werent worth 60 dollars so how does this game stack up compared to them

Why haven't we learned to disregard anything IGN says yet.
But this review actually does bring up good point's and is also well constructed.


No videogame is worth $60 when you can find the key for any popular game you want for 1/3 the price.

did they even have computers back then
The first commercial computer was the UNIVAC I, released in 1977.

The first Doom game was released in 1993.

Didn't you just stuffpost about how you hate undertale?
this frustrates me.
an opinion disagreeing with yours is not bait. posts made to provoke a negative reaction are bait. an opinion =/= a stuffpost or a bait. don't use buzzwords