just got my video taken down and a copyright strike from jewtube, AMA

[Torin]

apparently either because of the name i gave my video or the 5 seconds of music at the end,
my stupid 20 second tf2 video i made for my friends got taken down for loving nothing
what the forget "violating our policies" apparently actually full movies is ok but a loving joke video is not??
heres the video in question: http://justfilehosting.space/download.php?f=paegz (volume warning at the end)

so yeah, AMA

[Ad Bot]

[randomtroll39]

jesus forget add a sound warning

[Biostorm]

how does it feel being cucked by a site that's been taken over by cultural marxists?

we need a youtube replacement

slimtube when?

[Torin]

jesus forget add a sound warning

oh stuff sorry, forgot :o

how does it feel being cucked by a site that's been taken over by cultural marxists?

feels loving bad man

[Freek]

what a lot of people who gets strikes don't realize that a large percentage of copyright strikes given out are automatic.

[Dannu]

ContentID essentially found a registered song pattern in your video and forgeted it up.

[Refticus]

add farting sounds to the end of it, it will throw off youtube copyright.

[Clownfish]

can somebody loving explain to me why you can upload a song in it's entirety and it doesn't get taken down but you can't have a 3 second clip of sound in your video or you get striked and they remove your channel after enough times

[Ravencroft·]

I used to love making YouTube videos until Google took over.

[Torin]

the loving email i got legitimately made me want to punch something

It's not okay to post large amounts of untargeted, unwanted, or repetitive content to YouTube.

because you know, a video i made for a friend (WHICH I DIDN'T EVEN INTEND TO PROFIT OFF OF OR HAVE OTHER PEOPLE SEE IT) is a loving sin, but this is ok?

If the main purpose of your content is to drive people off of YouTube and onto another site, it will likely violate our spam policies.

WHAT THE forget IS THIS SUPPOSED TO MEAN? are they implying that people that make videos on their website are driving people to dislike the website, but not their broken policies and loving jew ass copyright?
jesus christ.

[Torin]

I forgot to mention something else it said

In addition, misleading descriptions, tags, titles, or thumbnails designed to increase views are not allowed.

the thing is, i could agree that this one is my fault for giving the video the name, even though the loving length is not an hour and a half long.
but what is ok is all the loving, vine compilations with clickbait thumbnails or buzzfeed videos?

[randomtroll39]

can you appeal it?

[Torin]

can you appeal it?

i've already tried, i'm waiting for a response.
i mean it's not a huge loss, it's just a dumb video but that's not why i'm loving enraged.

[Planr]

Keep in mind that if your appeal fails, youtube may possibly ban your account indefinitely. Nostalgia Critic talked about this once in his #WTFU videos. This was part of why he was so reluctant to appeal sometimes because of the big risk that his appeal would be rejected, and that as a result his channel - his very livelihood - would be deleted.

Make no mistake, the youtube copyright system is bullstuff. Literally NO ONE likes it. There is no background checking done whatsoever by human personnel; the automation and facelessness of youtube results in fake copyright reports done by bot accounts and content holders who don't understand nor respect copyright law putting strikes on genuine rule-abiding accounts, and you can't even fight it without risking getting straight-up BANNED from YouTube. It's absolutely horrible. It needs to be redone from the ground-up.

[Torin]

thanks for the warning planr, i appreciate it.