Author Topic: [UK EU Referendum] - UK VOTES LEAVE | 51.89% // 48.11%  (Read 48844 times)


I think you're trying to meme too hard.
You can never meme too hard
« Last Edit: June 24, 2016, 10:07:03 PM by Red Spy »

It's not deceptive because it's raw data.
But it's not raw data. 'Raw' data implies ungraphed data points, like "1.375 GBP/USD on 6/24/2016". The fact that they aren't lying about the numbers doesn't mean that it isn't misrepresentation. Go back to where I posted two graphs of 'true' data showing completely different things.

The USD and GBP are in the 1 to 2 area so other values are absolutely arbitrary.
If the y-axis went from 1-2 GBP/USD, it would actually show a realistic relative change. The graph you showed was between something like 1.5 and 1.3, which meant that the 10% drop looked more like 80%.

The social pressure kids get to not offend anyone -- is astounding -- and take it up the ass by way of goddamn immigrants, seeing their cultures destroyed by 3rd world monkeys who refuse to integrate into society.  If you don't conform to the 'progressive' agenda, you're called a tribal and a bigot.  

Just look at this youtube comment thread.  Thank god the replies have some sense left in them.   But there's still 17 morons that thumbed that comment up.  You see this stuff everyday and it's gone too damn far, which is why we're seeing the rise of nationalism via Annoying Orange here in America and Brexit in Europe.  

People are sick of these goddamn immigrants invading their counties and raping, leeching welfare, building mosques, trying to implement sharia law, etc.


The social pressure kids get to not offend anyone -- is astounding -- and take it up the ass
why did u put dashes there






ORANJE BOVEN ORANJE BOVEN KOMEN TO NEDERLANDS BRITAIN WE HOLD YOUR REFUGEES LIKE YOU HOLD US WHEN NAPOLEON RAIDED HOLLANDE JA. IK BEN NEDERLANDS BOVEN EN ALWAYS BOVEN KOMEN NAAR NEDERLANDS!!

ooga booga go back to africa


bongo bongo bongo dun want to leave da congo

"There are, for example, Trotskyists who have become simply enemies of the U.S.S.R. without developing a corresponding loyalty to any other unit. When one grasps the implications of this, the nature of what I mean by nationalism becomes a good deal clearer. A nationalist is one who thinks solely, or mainly, in terms of competitive prestige. He may be a positive or a negative nationalist—that is, he may use his mental energy either in boosting or in denigrating—but at any rate his thoughts always turn on victories, defeats, triumphs and humiliations. He sees history, especially contemporary history, as the endless rise and decline of great power units and every event that happens seems to him a demonstration that his own side is on the upgrade and some hated rival is on the downgrade. But finally, it is important not to confuse nationalism with mere worship of success. The nationalist does not go on the principle of simply ganging up with the strongest side. On the contrary, having picked his side, he persuades himself that it is the strongest and is able to stick to his belief even when the facts are overwhelmingly against him."

-George Orwell

Edit:
There was a time when this group of immigrants came to a union of nations and they raped, murdered, brought horrible diseases that killed 95% of them, and spread their religion. You might've heard of them.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2016, 12:09:08 AM by Magus »

If it just shows high and low it can look like a giant fall. Since we're talking money that suggests GBP has dropped to become of little worth.

If you show the whole graph then you can see that while it is has dropped a sizable amount it is still quite strong.

If you just wanted to know that GBP has dropped in value you don't need it in graph form. But to give it as a graph edited in such a way leaves the data to be misinterpreted.
But it's not raw data. 'Raw' data implies ungraphed data points, like "1.375 GBP/USD on 6/24/2016". The fact that they aren't lying about the numbers doesn't mean that it isn't misrepresentation. Go back to where I posted two graphs of 'true' data showing completely different things.
If the y-axis went from 1-2 GBP/USD, it would actually show a realistic relative change. The graph you showed was between something like 1.5 and 1.3, which meant that the 10% drop looked more like 80%.

There's no point to a graph if there isn't data to represent the changes. Yeah it looks like a big fall, because it is. But that doesn't make it look like its worth nothing. There is numbers on the side of the graph for a reason, and that's what makes it raw data. If you misinterpret what data is showing, sounds like your own damn fault.

At this point, it feels like the only people making it sensationalist are the people telling you not to make it sensationalist.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2016, 12:09:41 AM by ShadowsfeaR »


give a list chronologically of the value thingy using

like "1.375 GBP/USD on 6/24/2016".

which are completely seperate from tampering with the y-axis