...doesn't invalidate what?
it being a police state. You can still use SWAT or National Guard to enforce that totalitarianism.
It's a logical fallacy because there's no reason or evidence to suggest that militarized police will lead to a police state other than "it is a prerequisite". It's the equivalent of saying "we shouldn't have gay marriage because it will lead to inter-species marriage" which was a real thing
comparing me to someone who thinks gay marriage will lead to inter-species marriage is a stupid attempt to derail my argument, dumb cunt.
there's absolute reason and evidence to suggest that militarized police will lead to a police state, look at national socialist-Germany, they took the citizens guns away, armed the stuff out of their soldiers, and then went to conduct genocide and enforce a dictatorship/totalitarianistic country.
None of that is happening here besides the effort to take our guns away and the militarization of police. What happened in national socialist-Germany won't be happening here, but considering the ideal of possibility nothing is out of the question, such as a Police State.
Rip Schleswig
didn't know he was an alt, rip.