Author Topic: Controversy sparks over "Pride Los Santos" GTA V Gay pride mod  (Read 7520 times)

From a gameplay perspective, this is another loving CUNT enforcing anti-game cinematic bullstuff to meet the tastes of the author without any consideration for the audience.

forget 'em, and forget any "artsy" developer who thinks they're amazing because they can't be arsed to make a good G-A-M-E for the player.
poe's law?

i don't get why literally anyone would hate this
people who like gays are happy because it's a mod for gays and people against gays can run them over or shoot them in the face

i don't get why literally anyone would hate this
people who like gays are happy because it's a mod for gays and people against gays can run them over or shoot them in the face
except you cant run them over and shoot them in the face

i don't get why literally anyone would hate this
people who like gays are happy because it's a mod for gays and people against gays can run them over or shoot them in the face

the mod adds nothing except spewing their agenda in a poor fashion

see:


whackin's got the right idea, theres nothing wrong about gay pride but really, GTA V mods??

just don't dl the mod............???

I don't understand this response to this mod; its just as controversy inducing as rape mod but not in a bad way and if it just is poorly executed or offends your taste just dont dl it??
or am i missing something here

except you cant run them over and shoot them in the face
oh stuff how'd i miss that in op lol, my bad

just don't dl the mod............???
"Just don't download the child research?"

The point is that mod developers should NOT be immune to criticism and should be held to high standards if they're going upload their content for the public, ESPECIALLY if they're planning on doing some kind of social commentary like this.

In this case, the mod author has decided to lock off core gameplay functionality so they can make some ridiculous social commentary statement that has no place being inside what is supposed to be a parody of the "American Dream".

Yes, I am getting a bit too overactive with my arguments, but recently I've just been so pissed off with modders who think that because they went out and did a few config tweaks they're suddenly gods who deserve showering of praise and prizes. I could have easily done what you did, the difference being that I knew it goes against what makes GTA fun and who the audience of GTA is.

"Just don't download the child research?"
This a bullstuff comparison and you know it. No one is being abused and molested by this mod existing, and using this argument suggests you're really clutching at straws for a means to validate how exorbitantly angry you're getting over something so minor, again.
The point is that mod developers should NOT be immune to criticism and should be held to high standards if they're going upload their content for the public, ESPECIALLY if they're planning on doing some kind of social commentary like this.
Why do all mod developers have to be held to a high standard for mods they do for free, for their own personal reasons.
This a mod supported by a charity that's trying to just spread a little bit of their own fun through a game. It doesn't matter if they restrict parts of the core game for their own thing. They're just using GTA as a medium.

Would you scream at a hobbyist/non-professional for drawing a picture and not using all of the paper?
In this case, the mod author has decided to lock off core gameplay functionality so they can make some ridiculous social commentary statement that has no place being inside what is supposed to be a parody of the "American Dream".
Really? You're upset because the inability to run down a Pride Parade doesn't match the theme of the base game?
Do you stuff yourself over the mods for robot mechas, superpowers, or car tornados? They have nothing to do with GTAs themes.

GTA isn't some holy ground that it's treason to defile.
Yes, I am getting a bit too overactive with my arguments, but recently I've just been so pissed off with modders who think that because they went out and did a few config tweaks they're suddenly gods who deserve showering of praise and prizes.
That doesn't seem to be the case here at all. The modders don't look like they're after a pat on the back.

Anyone seriously upset just has their knickers in a twist.

If you don't like it, don't download it. No one forces you to download or confront any mod.
Or you could make your own mod to gun down pride parades if that's what you actually care about.

Or just download The Ballad of Gay Tony and shoot up the gay club there.

This a bullstuff comparison and you know it. No one is being abused and molested by this mod existing, and using this argument suggests you're really clutching at straws for a means to validate how exorbitantly angry you're getting over something so minor, again.
No, nobody is going to be abused or molested by this mod, but I seriously do believe that it's a VERY bad thing as a content creator to waste somebody's time. Believe it or not, game designers (and modders) have moral standards they should be aiming for to. Just because you don't want to think about them doesn't mean they exist.

My point is that not acknowledging something doesn't make it go away.

Why do all mod developers have to be held to a high standard for mods they do for free, for their own personal reasons.
Because they're producing content for other people. You're taking their bandwidth, their hard-drive space, their electricity and their time. You might say "oh it doesn't matter uuuuhhhhhhh", but you're smart enough to know that you wouldn't want your time wasted either.

If you're making a mod for yourself, keep it to yourself. If you have any slight interest in making content for other people, then you damn well better make sure your content is made in the interest of not wasting another person's time. Making mods isn't about masturbating over a game, it's about making other people's experiences with a game better or more interesting.

This a mod supported by a charity that's trying to just spread a little bit of their own fun through a game.
And rather than enhancing the gameplay experience, it ends up ruining it and blocking off players from interacting with the game world. Other GTA mods give players more interactions, rather than taking away from them.

It'd be acceptable if there was an actual decent statement about the gameplay in the mix (see that one DOOM mod design to riff on Call of Duty). There's literally no relevance of the message of the mod to the core gameplay.

It doesn't matter if they restrict parts of the core game for their own thing. They're just using GTA as a medium.
Yes, it does.

As I said, the role of mods is to enhance the player's experience of a game (the exception are total conversions/overhauls, which you can basically see as new video games on top of the pre-existing and compiled engine). My experience is not enhanced when I literally cannot interact with part of the world thanks to the mod.

Would you scream at a hobbyist/non-professional for drawing a picture and not using all of the paper?
If I felt that the hobbyist was wasting their time and could be using that time to achieve amazing, cool stuff that would benefit themselves and others, I would do anything in my power to get them to do things better.

I've seen so many talented people waste their wonderful talents on producing stuff, because they haven't learnt better by figuring out who their audience is. Why make stuff and spent the effort to upload and release it if nobody wants to play with it because it ruins their experience? Wouldn't you want to be known for making awesome stuff that makes the game twice as good?

You're upset because the inability to run down a Pride Parade doesn't match the theme of the base game?
Dooble, you're not that stupid.

You know exactly what I'm arguing about. I'm arguing about standards and quality control and the removal of player interactions. You know that I take games seriously and you know that I care a lot about making sure the player gets to have a damn good time doing whatever they want within the rules of the gameplay, and that inconsistent rules are the BANE of my existence.

Yes, I get that most players dislike this because they want to (jokingly or non-jokingly) run down the participants, but those aren't my reasons. If I downloaded this mod, I'd actually like to see how they'd behave if I drove/stopped in front of them, if I walked up to members of the parade and stared at them, if I tripped up one member central to the parade etc. Removing those interactions means that these guys are nothing more than a moving brick wall that doesn't respond to the player, breaking the immersion (basic player psychology).


Do you stuff yourself over the mods for robot mechas, superpowers, or car tornados? They have nothing to do with GTAs themes.
Do they break or do they add to the player's possible world interactions? Also, wasn't there a part of GTA V that involved getting so high that you "get abducted by aliens and fall through the sky"? This game accentuates the insanity and it tries to point out that routine leads to people going nuts.

GTA isn't some holy ground that it's treason to defile.
It's a video game with well balanced mechanics and world interactions. Upsetting those interactions ruins the immersion. You might not think that's important, but you're not the one playing the game with the mod installed as far as I'm aware.

The modders don't look like they're after a pat on the back.
Maybe you're right, but with a mod as "big" as this which is trying to "tackle" a big social issue, I think on some level they were looking for a reaction from the audience.

Anyone seriously upset just has their knickers in a twist.
Or maybe there's legitimate complaints that some people have?

If you don't like it, don't download it. No one forces you to download or confront any mod.
This is LITERALLY the worst argument used by anybody ever.

Not posting, commenting or critiquing on something that is clearly stuff does NOT make that thing less stuff, nor does it let others know why they shouldn't make stuff. The Internet is about allowing people to have a voice; it's completely unfair to silence those who have a different opinion to you on the basis of "they don't like it", especially when there's deeper reasoning at play.

The simple fact of the matter is that it's being talked about, which brings it to my attention and brings the bad practices behind it to my attention. It's not the mod I'm most angry about, but it's an example I can use to voice my frustrations.

Or you could make your own mod to gun down pride parades if that's what you actually care about.
Yes, every time somebody does something wrong, rather than have them understand and fix it, let's just have other people copy it with minor changes and upload that? Because that's going to go down well! No copyright complaints, flame wars or large-scale drama ever came from that!

Or just download The Ballad of Gay Tony and shoot up the gay club there.
Yeah, buy a $30USD expansion pack which has far less refined mechanics and interactions just to compensate for the fact that a mod doesn't let me do the same things to the parade pedestrians that I can do to every other pedestrian in the world.

Very smart.


"dont dl it????"

oh so if someone makes a mod that installs a virus and bricks your pc, the creator is completely innocent cause you dont have to dl it?

the "y r u mad just dont dl it" is the most half asses loving excuse ever.

I don't think you can fault for me for enjoying a good debate; it's literally what a sales person does (if a little less aggressive).

Besides, I really do care about games and making sure people who make cool stuff do that cool stuff right. I don't want people wasting effort like I have.

"dont dl it????"

oh so if someone makes a mod that installs a virus and bricks your pc, the creator is completely innocent cause you dont have to dl it?
This is as equally poor a comparison as the child research one. If this mod happened to have a virus in it then your argument would be true. "Just don't download" isn't a valid argument when someone is spreading viruses.
But when you're looking at a mod that describes itself as a Gay Pride Parade mod, and you've been made well aware that the NPC's are indestructible, then you are to solely to blame if you download the mod knowing you don't like any of that.

It's like hating cheese&onion crisps, then buying and eating a packet, and complaining that they make cheese&onion crisps.

No, nobody is going to be abused or molested by this mod, but I seriously do believe that it's a VERY bad thing as a content creator to waste somebody's time. Believe it or not, game designers (and modders) have moral standards they should be aiming for to. Just because you don't want to think about them doesn't mean they exist.

My point is that not acknowledging something doesn't make it go away.
I simply don't understand how the mod is wasting anyones time. It's clearly described what it is, and if you look at that and choose that you want it, you're getting what you want. It's not a lucky dip, or a falsely advertised product.
And I likewise don't see how removing a feature is failing to meet a moral standard. Particularly when morals are entirely subjective, and the reason that they have removed the feature is on account of their own morals (They originally had the killability in, and accepted it as a fact of the medium, but decided against its inclusion following the Orlando attack).

And rather than enhancing the gameplay experience, it ends up ruining it and blocking off players from interacting with the game world. Other GTA mods give players more interactions, rather than taking away from them.

It'd be acceptable if there was an actual decent statement about the gameplay in the mix (see that one DOOM mod design to riff on Call of Duty). There's literally no relevance of the message of the mod to the core gameplay.
It's entirely subjective as to whether their design choice ruins the gameplay experience, particularly given the people the mod is marketed at are people wishing to celebrate in a gay pride parade. Those who would use the mod to destroy a parade aren't the intended audience, and I don't believe that the mod developers owe the alternate market. Not when the developers ask for and get nothing in return for people using their mod.

Yes, it does.
As I said, the role of mods is to enhance the player's experience of a game (the exception are total conversions/overhauls, which you can basically see as new video games on top of the pre-existing and compiled engine). My experience is not enhanced when I literally cannot interact with part of the world thanks to the mod.
I don't think you have the responsibility to say what a mod can and cannot do. You clearly want different things from mods than these people wish to give.
And at any rate they're enhancing their own view of a sandbox game. If that's not what you want from the mod then it does come down to deciding not play or the endorse the mod.

If I felt that the hobbyist was wasting their time and could be using that time to achieve amazing, cool stuff that would benefit themselves and others, I would do anything in my power to get them to do things better.

I've seen so many talented people waste their wonderful talents on producing stuff, because they haven't learnt better by figuring out who their audience is. Why make stuff and spent the effort to upload and release it if nobody wants to play with it because it ruins their experience? Wouldn't you want to be known for making awesome stuff that makes the game twice as good?
If you force a hobbyist to do as you want, to design things how you want (which is ultimately what this boils down to), then you're restricting their hobby. People have clashes of opinion, and it's not right to insist yours upon someone else.
Now yes, you can say that a modder insists their opinion on design on another person, but it's not something anyone has to agree to put up with.

Hobbies are often more about pleasing yourself at any rate than pleasing anyone else. Hence it not being professiona.
This is LITERALLY the worst argument used by anybody ever.

Not posting, commenting or critiquing on something that is clearly stuff does NOT make that thing less stuff, nor does it let others know why they shouldn't make stuff. The Internet is about allowing people to have a voice; it's completely unfair to silence those who have a different opinion to you on the basis of "they don't like it", especially when there's deeper reasoning at play.
Let me state that I'm not saying people shouldn't criticise, or discuss these things. But I don't get the need for such vehemently bitter response to such a bbrown town and non-impacting issue.
The most self-evident means of critique are the ratings/download-numbers on these mods. And there's room for discussion on the internet to critique too, but getting antsy and insisting that the mods never be created, or that they're some sort of almight affront to all things proper is just so out of proportion to the debate at hand.

The opinions reaching that side of the argument go so far as to inhibit creativity, and slap down those who even try, or are doing the most simple of things in sharing their creation.

Yes, every time somebody does something wrong, rather than have them understand and fix it, let's just have other people copy it with minor changes and upload that? Because that's going to go down well! No copyright complaints, flame wars or large-scale drama ever came from that!
What you find wrong is not an ultimate truth. We're talking about an area of creativity where everyone gets a go, and no one is forced to do as they like. The beauty of the system is you can try your own hand.

We're in a great community here where we encounter this all the time. If you join someones Blockland server and find them building a castle, or hosting a TDM, or roleplaying, and it's not quite to your tastes, or there's something about it you don't like, then it's not acceptable for you to scream and shout for changes to be made. We know that from Dramas about people who do it, or who make Dramas to complaing about someone else banning them for being demanding.
But you're more than free, and even encouraged, to try your own hand at it. Or find someone else doing it better, who is more in line with your views.

You're not going to face copyright charges because you imitated a concept on a sandbox game which you're not making money for. And there's always going to be drama about mods, and the case is either that you're causing it arguing over someone elses work that isn't right for you, or you can make what is right for you and enjoy that, and then put up with whatever drama happens from people complaining about you copying.

Yeah, buy a $30USD expansion pack which has far less refined mechanics and interactions just to compensate for the fact that a mod doesn't let me do the same things to the parade pedestrians that I can do to every other pedestrian in the world.
You can't always have your cake and eat it.
The options are there for you. Make your own, or find an alternative.

I'm just giving one suggestion if you happen to be adamant about gunning down gays.
There are also fairly large groups of gay people who hang out near the gay-clubs in northern Los Santos, if you want to run those people down too.


I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree however, McJob.
I know you have different views to me on how games, and their various aspects should be handled. And I respect that you're committed to them.

I don't think that there's a be-all and end-all to how games, or mods should be run, is my opinion, really.
I might not like the decision in this case, but I understand why it was made, and it doesn't have to impact my enjoyment of the game, and I don't think it should have to impact the enjoyment of anyone else.

What is the outrage about? If people want to mod homos and trannie parades into the game, go on ahead. Why should I care? It's not hurting anyone.

As to why the NPCs are invincible, whatever the reason might be, I think one of them is to stop /pol/tards from filming a video where they're massacring gay people with 8 Riddler speeches overlayered the audiotrack at the same time.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 11:30:47 AM by Rednakin »

Here let me just sum up why I'm not even going to bother reading McJob's little crybaby rant:

"Just don't download the child research?"