Author Topic: Seth Rich, source of the DNC leaks, has been murdered - $20k reward by WikiLeaks  (Read 6069 times)

if this were done by the DNC, they would try to make it look like a robbery by taking his stuff. they would make it appear to be a happenstance crime. they wouldn't be so careless.
they're untouchable no matter what. no major media outlets are going to report it. there's no "solid evidence" tracing it to them. they could have displayed his corpse on a pike in front of their headquarters and they wouldn't have to answer for it
he also had nothing left to say. the full leak is public now. there was no reason to silence him.
1. they can't confirm that he wont expose them further. in your words, they wouldn't be so careless.
2. people can be petty and act violently in retaliation / "revenge" for what he did to the DNC

there's a difference between "full-on tinfoil hat" and "this group has a notably convincing motive and it wouldn't be surprising or out-of-the-ordinary behavior in the slightest in terms of U.S. politics"
You're literally saying "The DNC has motive and resources, therefore they did it."

That's not evidence. That's called personal conjecture. AKA tinfoil-hatting.

You're literally saying "The DNC has motive and resources, therefore they did it."

That's not evidence. That's called personal conjecture. AKA tinfoil-hatting.
yea, there are lots of convenient deaths--since there are a lot of inconvenient people. this one wasn't even particularly convienient, since the leak already took place.

on another note, why was this dude who leaked the DNC just walking around DC? i guess his actions weren't criminal or what?

DNC corruption? impossible!
bro i have never supported the DNC

people listen to the bullstuff zealot spouts?
> maybe it wasnt a conspiracy (esp since theres no evidence)
> BULLstuff!

ok lol
« Last Edit: August 10, 2016, 12:22:40 AM by McZealot »

I'm gonna go claim my reward cause I know who did it.

Hillary Clinton

You're literally saying "The DNC has motive and resources, therefore they did it."

That's not evidence. That's called personal conjecture. AKA tinfoil-hatting.
and that's called "strawmanning". nowhere did i say it's a fact, only that it's likely, and that i wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if it was proven true.

that... wasn't a strawman. he obviously wasn't speaking literally.

that... wasn't a strawman. he obviously wasn't speaking literally.
You're literally saying "The DNC has motive and resources, therefore they did it."

and that's called "strawmanning". nowhere did i say it's a fact, only that it's likely, and that i wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if it was proven true.
The way you worded what you said definitely gave off the vibe, don't accuse me of intentionally strawmanning you.

Even saying "The DNC has motive and resources, therefore it's LIKELY they did it" is completely invalid. Having resources and motive is not equivalent, even slightly, to guilt. And even then saying "Likely" is complete crap. 0.01%? 1%? 10%? 20%? 99.999%? You can't decide. Yes, there exists, out there, in the vast sea of billions of possibilities, the one possibility that the DNC ordered a hit on him. That does not make it reasonable to believe that the DNC assassinated him.

Notice that even WikiLeaks themselves isn't assuming this, because they know that would be irresponsible and logically invalid.

why is it such a sin to consider the possibility that the DNC or Hillary Clinton is involved? that's all anyone is doing, and you're fighting it to the death

why is it such a sin to consider the possibility that the DNC or Hillary Clinton is involved? that's all anyone is doing, and you're fighting it to the death
I explicitly recognize that there is a possibility in my post. I'm saying it's unreasonable to actually believe that the DNC ordered a hit on Seth. And i've made like, 2 posts on it now. That's like a minor scuffle lol

I'm gonna go claim my reward cause I know who did it.

Hillary Clinton

season 2 of making a murderer


hey did you guys here about that sorta mean thing donald said the other day? what an awful dude am I right

alright you made your point. it's only my opinion / gut feeling that they are responsible. im not gonna try to logically defend it beyond this, because it just would not surprise me personally, considering the history of political assassinations in the democratic party.

hillary clinton ordered a hit on harambe and followed it up with this poor man. REST IN PEACE


hey did you guys here about that sorta mean thing donald said the other day? what an awful dude am I right
That guy's so loving evil