Author Topic: Hillary cannot mentally run this nation  (Read 11993 times)

Well for starters, who the hell would lie about being raped?
A lot of people lol

Just because you're not stuffty doesn't mean everyone else isn't stuffty

I did watch the video, twice now. Why would I even loving comment here if I didn't watch the video? I'm not handicapped.


A lot of people lol

Just because you're not stuffty doesn't mean everyone else isn't stuffty
I bet you think its not rape if she says yes. If she regrets it, its rape.
I'm not handicapped.
You've proven multiple times that you are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhqUk28OwHs
Ran out of words so you just resort to stuffty videos? Plus this video doesn't even corrolate to what I said at all.


Ran out of words so you just resort to stuffty videos? Plus this video doesn't even corrolate to what I said at all.
Get that stick outta your ass
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-seizure-video/

5 seconds of research. Literally 5 seconds.
"google is my source"

Get that stick outta your ass
you loving what

Leisure unless if you're going to treat this maturely, then leave. Plus you didn't even use that term correctly, lmfao
« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 07:21:59 PM by Insert Name Here² »

I bet you think its not rape if she says yes. If she regrets it, its rape.


"google is my source"

he did the same thing you did lol
« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 07:22:36 PM by Decepticon »

you loving what

Leisure unless if you're going to treat this maturely, then leave
If we were treating this argument seriously, then you wouldn't be defending cnn as a credible source. Anyone who bothers listening to a hypocritical conspiracy nutjob like Humble Water Filter Merchant (who's anti-government yet supports a fascist like Annoying Orange) has already drunken the kool aid.
he did the same thing you did lol
that's the irony


guys the video doesn't even present any evidence he iterally just repeats speculation made from different sources and *claims* that experts agreed with him even though he provides absolutely no evidence of that, taking some random internet strangers word on a rather large decision like this without any concrete evidence would be very irresponsible.

I was asking Ipqaurx if he was going to dismiss the entire idea and argument BECAUSE it's cnn.
Nope, though I assume you've realized that even though you haven't responded to my posts
« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 07:28:13 PM by Ipquarx »

If we were treating this argument seriously, then you wouldn't be defending cnn as a credible source.
Except I wasn't defending cnn. I was asking Ipqaurx if he was going to dismiss the entire idea and argument BECAUSE it's cnn. I agree that cnn can be stuff, but completely dismissing the entire argument and points they make and the only reason behind it is "muh cnn" is just idiotic tbh.
Nope
Do you have any proof to back this up? Or will you just dismiss it because "muh cnn xd"
Looks like a question to me, I asked you if you were going to back it up or if you were going to dismiss it because it's cnn.

Also I didn't respond because you made some really good points Ipquarx and I had nothing to say about them, that's why I completely dropped the idea that you were dismissing it until Leisure brought it up again
« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 07:32:12 PM by Insert Name Here² »

how is it ironic at all
because tony claims all the time about how he doesn't need to provide sources because "people will always discredit them" and how "google is my source" yet a simple google search or a quick trip to snopes would have given him the real answer, which is that this is another tabloid-level manufactured scandal from Annoying Orange.

i'd rather have a bad president over a president that wants to build a giant ass wall and will probably forget up america