Author Topic: Princeton banned the word "man" on their campus.  (Read 12379 times)

Are you sure that isn't just puberty making kids loveually confused

It's PC gender bullstuff that is making kids more confused than they should be after hitting puberty.

Puberty is bad enough, now you have this stuff added on top of it.

It's PC gender bullstuff that is making kids more confused than they should be after hitting puberty.

Is your source Google, or are you using Bing now?

Is your source Google, or are you using Bing now?

You don't have to believe me. I'm not going out of my way to show you statistics of this stuff happening.

To be fair, if it were just puberty children would have been stoned to death constantly.

As it should be for the reprobates of the world.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2016, 09:41:51 PM by Frequency »

So in 2016 are we classifying gender as a mental way of thinking?

For millions of years gender was classified as physical, lol.

So mentally I am a non-binary loveually ambiguous giraffe but physically I am a male.

That's where this argument is.

"social construct"


when you wake up and the year is too current

I'm surprised how many people are tired of Tony's bullstuff now. Good.

I'll do you one better. Charlotte, North Carolina schools are banning words like 'boy' and 'girl' because they're now considered hate crime. They are now also supposed to support students to dress / act as whatever gender identity they want.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/15/charlotte-north-carolina-schools-eliminate-gender-entirely/

I'll do you one better. Charlotte, North Carolina schools are banning words like 'boy' and 'girl' because they're now considered hate crime. They are now also supposed to support students to dress / act as whatever gender identity they want.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/15/charlotte-north-carolina-schools-eliminate-gender-entirely/
did you read past the first paragraph
where, you know
snopes debunks that statement as far exaggerated

that being said, i would find it difficult to be upset about people wanting to use different words than me. the only problem is if you're suddenly being stigmatized for language that's always been acceptable in your experience, it's hard to retroactively internalize new connotations if you haven't personally experienced something that changes them
It's like the elderly calling black people mondays.

retroactively internalize new connotations

Thesauruses make me angry. :(

Personally I think this gender stuff is a fad anyways, wait until tumblr dies out.

Thesauruses make me angry. :(
same tbh...

if you mean that people should probably find different words if the ones they use aren't acceptable any more, then yeah, of course they should. it's debatable whether or not we've reached that point yet, but we are definitely heading in the direction of at least having "they/them/their" being acceptable as gender neutral pronouns. actually that's already the case in casual conversation because it's really easy and useful to have available, not even just because of trans topics.

i was just saying that people don't easily change their emotive understanding of language to be more prohibitive, not just the people who are stubborn, but also the people who just never used the language in malice, they just used it because those were the words they knew and they never had to think about it.

It's like the elderly calling black people mondays.
yeah it's defo the same kind of thing, tho monday has probably always been understood in a derogatory way. it's even worse when you have to think about literally any english word with "man" in it. it'd be a hard push to actually get people to have a problem with that. language tends to evolve toward simplicity, so i wouldn't be surprised if some of these tweaks did actually become more standard if they're easier to say, but otherwise, it's probably going to be something reserved for professional and formal environments.

I'm not. I've seen FtM operations that have the woman cut pieces of her arm off that grafts onto a tube to create a snake in which the FtM has to squeeze a pressure thing to get an erection.
Biologically speaking the FtM is basically pumping an artificial snake covered in living tissue. It's not a real snake, it cannot produce sperm. There is no blood flow to produce an erection.
It's not real.

You'd think it'd just be easier to send them to counselling to learn how to deal with "dysphoria" rather than turning their genitals into a loving modern art piece with an expensive surgery.

People who think "man" contained in any word carry's weight are pretty dumb. It's a term that's become so general these days that the gender of it hardly stands out. Helmsman for example makes me think of a job position and not the gender.

This. It's literally contained in the word "woman". It's just the English language.

this post gave me fake ptsd to a "is a feminine snake a thing" argument I had

Holy stuff dude forget that argument, I'm actually triggered now

Better make sure the safe word is inclusive when they come to forget every student in the ass.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2016, 04:26:15 AM by c »