thought: what if the forums had an age limit, and how high should it be

[The Murderous Cop]

i've been noticing a lot of new and young forumers (mostly 11 or under) making all the older forumers annoyed with their constant spamming and bad content

so here's a thought i had: what if the forums had an age limit, and how high should it be?
i honestly think 14 is enough, most people have aged enough to know what's right and what's wrong

and if they haven't they really shouldn't be on the internet in the first place

and also, if their age is under and they register anyways (bypass it by typing a fake year or something), and mention their actual age, their ban length should just be until they turn 14. or perma. either or.
thoughts? would it be helpful, would it even work, etc. etc.

[Ad Bot]

[Decepticon]

12 or 13+

put them in line when they're young

[Twerky]

Pretty sure it used to be around 13+

[IkeTheGeneric]

16+ tbh

[Red Spy]

14 or until you can use proper grammar

[Bisjac]

18+ because of content.

...but 12+ so we can still meet girls

[SlayerZ99]

you mean minimum age not age limit

[Otis Da HousKat]

forget all of you kids. Ban everyone under 21.

[Tactical Nuke]

if you're under 18 you undergo a process where there's a floodcheck specifically for you and you're required to read the forum rules every day or two

other than that no limit

[Daswiruch]

forget all of you kids. Ban everyone under 21.

nobody over 18 allowed

ot: 13 because of coppa

[Hawt]

ban everyone under 30 years old

[Otis Da HousKat]

The Murderous Cop, you annoy me with your constant spamming and bad content.

[TheABELBOTO]

The Murderous Cop, you annoy me with your constant spamming and bad content.

Not really a spammer but I agree with bad content

[The Resonte!]

33+

[News]

ban everyone who isn't cool
will fix everything