thought: what if the forums had an age limit, and how high should it be

[The Resonte!]

ban everyone who isn't cool
will fix everything

only the coolest survive

[Ad Bot]

[Daswiruch]

ban everyone who isn't cool
will fix everything

in that case you'd be gone

[ßlöükfáce]

in that case i'd be gone

[Pah1023]

99% certain in the terms and conditions of the forums, you agree that you're above the age of 13.
So technically there is an age requirement, but it isn't enforced.

[Silleb²]

14 seems fine, it'll keep people like Raccoonneer out

[e-maxx]

nobody under 78

[Unova]

14 seems fine, it'll keep people like Raccoonneer out

what about a 10 inch richard requirement, you have to have a 10-12 inch richard to get into these forums, i'm 11 inches so w/e

[News]

in that case you'd be gone

you're right, i'm hella rad

[Jshotgun]

ban everyone who isn't cool
will fix everything

normie genocide

[The Murderous Cop]

Not really a spammer but I agree with bad content

this i can agree with

[Poliwhirl]

ban everyone above a certain age. get your old cynical ass outta here granpda

[TristanLuigi]

13+
i would say it wasn't until then that i wasn't cancer
i joined when i was 11 and my first two years were really cringey

the reason i don't think it should be higher is because age and maturity aren't linear and differ depending on the person
there are chill 13 year olds and obnoxious 16 year olds and i'd rather adopt a policy that lets in all the aight people even if it means a few obnoxious ones versus none of the obnoxious ones but missing some of the aight ones
if that makes sense

i'm also biased because i'm 15

[Electrk.]

in that case you'd be gone

#middleschoolburns

[Maxwell.]

13

[gr8dayseth]

there are a couple of people under 13 who do just fine but they don't seem to be in the majority
if there were one yeah 13 would be fair enough