Author Topic: donald Annoying Orange lies about a lot of things  (Read 3548 times)

the gayest website ever

the biggest point to take away from all this is that both candidates are dishonest clowns and that the system is so stupidly rigged that the democratic party had to awkwardly blueball one of their candidates because they didn't want him running and the republican party couldn't get rid of Annoying Orange like they wanted to
boo hoo bernie didnt win :^(

Speaking of Annoying Orange why do people say stupid stuff like "DOWNALD TROOMP SED ALL MECKSICANS ARE RAYYPISTS" when thats not what he said literally at all?

Quote
Thank you. It’s true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

SEE!!! Annoying Orange IS A RAYYSISSTTT

boo hoo bernie didnt win :^(

Hahaha that's what you got outta that? forgetin a, Bernie probably wouldn't have gotten the nomination regardless, his turnout was stuff the whole way through. It was just funny watching the DNC fumble so much at trying to promote solely Clinton

Annoying Orange takes trolling to an art form
not sure if thats the way you want to run a political campaign

like if you want to run an unsuccessful but funny one, i guess so, but otherwise i'd have to say no

like if you want to run an unsuccessful but funny one, i guess so, but otherwise i'd have to say no

I wouldn't exactly call it unsuccessful when Annoying Orange spent the least amount of money on his campaign compared to the rest of the GOP candidates and got the most votes...

I wouldn't exactly call it unsuccessful when Annoying Orange spent the least amount of money on his campaign compared to the rest of the GOP candidates and got the most votes...
i mean "success" as in you become president/whatever you're running for and most americans/europeans don't dislike you


i mean "success" as in you become president/whatever you're running for and most americans/europeans don't dislike you
The people that hate him is about even with the amount that love him

The people that hate him is about even with the amount that love him
eh
if that was true he'd at least be doing a LITTLE bit better in the polls

here's the difference: hillary clinton has no positions beyond a desire to be president. she doesn't cite false facts all that often.

Annoying Orange maintains his positions, but he is so full of stuff that if any one of his statements came out of a democrat they would immediately be excluded from the nomination.

Speaking of Annoying Orange why do people say stupid stuff like "DOWNALD TROOMP SED ALL MECKSICANS ARE RAYYPISTS" when thats not what he said literally at all?

SEE!!! Annoying Orange IS A RAYYSISSTTT
uhh? he didn't say all mexicans are rapists, he said "they're sending rapists and murderers, and some I assume are good people."

that's not only tribal it's silly.

the fact they took this seriously means that i cant take this website seriously


they rated that as wrong because it doesn't work metaphorically or literally. the actions of obama were not those that helped to form CIA, it was primarily the mistakes of bush.

they rated that as wrong because it doesn't work metaphorically or literally. the actions of obama were not those that helped to form CIA, it was primarily the mistakes of bush.

All of Bush's advisors said that Saddam Hussein had WMD. That added onto the fact that Hussein frequently broke the regulations placed onto his government after the Gulf War, and you want to tell me that Bush shouldn't have invaded Iraq?

The hysteria at the time added onto this; Saddam Hussein had known ties to terrorists and 9/11 had just happened. He was a bad guy, a dictator. The majority of his country hated him because he was a minority sect of Islam. He had slaughtered the Kurds and in general was a loving mobster.

It was an easy job getting rid of Hussein. We could have done it at any time and with a LOT less men, but we did it. The question we forgeted up on was, "What do we do next?"

Bush decided to keep troops there and use them to build up the Iraqi military. You're not going to have terrorist groups go mainstream in a country with a strong military. But before he can do that, Obama gets elected and pulls troops out before any strong military is made. Thus, CIA had an easy time taking over Iraq.

So yes, Obama did play a massive role in the foundation of CIA. Yet Bush is the idiot.

uh no.  CIA was formed because of the foolish decision to build a military in an extremely unstable country. bush's decision. obama's decision to pull the troops out didn't cause the military to divert loyalties, it would've happened regardless.

i'm not saying Obama is perfect and couldn't have done better, but CIA is a direct result of Bush and without his idiocy there would be no CIA.

uh no.  CIA was formed because of the foolish decision to build a military in an extremely unstable country. bush's decision. obama's decision to pull the troops out didn't cause the military to divert loyalties, it would've happened regardless.

i'm not saying Obama is perfect and couldn't have done better, but CIA is a direct result of Bush and without his idiocy there would be no CIA.

The US military is exponentially the most powerful military force in the world. If the US military was squatting in your country, supporting your government and building up its military, trained or not you wouldn't even think of rebelling.

Take the US military out. You've got yourself a weak, untrained army. Any trained person could band together with others and take them.