Author Topic: Hillary Clinton Has Volunteer Event In Ohio no one showed up  (Read 12104 times)

Adam can simplify the entire process so you can understand it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90RajY2nrgk

WRONG!

It has already been loving proven, if you really knew how electoral college votes works. Is that electoral voters are not obligated to vote for the candidate with the most votes in a state.

It has already been shown in previous elections where one state votes for candidate A but the electoral voter votes for candidate B.

Electors hardly ever not honor their pledge.

And there's no reason to expect it this time.

Electors hardly ever not honor their pledge.

And there's no reason to expect it this time.

That's bullstuff, how far are you in deniability?

Are you even old enough to vote?

Quote
Age:    N/A

They are not legally obligated to honor their state. What is with you people thinking that in your fairy tale land that the electoral votes would be honored?

That's bullstuff, how far are you in deniability?

Are you even old enough to vote?

First off, my age should have nothing to do with this. If I can argue a point and I can back it up, then my age doesn't matter.

First off, there's no reason to expect electors to not follow their states' popular vote. Thre were no faithless electors in 2012, nor in 2008. In 2004, one dumbass from Minnesota cast their vote for the Democratic vice candidate. In 2000, one elector from DC didn't cast a vote as a form of protest against the district's lack of representation.

You can go back through the years and find examples, but there's no chance of a giant faithless elector wave that would hand the presidency to Hillary. Despite numerous instances of faithlessness as of 2015, faithless electors have never come close to affecting the results or ultimate outcome of any other presidential election. Twenty-nine states have laws against such a thing. And let's not pretend that such a swing wouldn't cause controversy, which is why electors won't conspirate to do it.

I'm no fan of the electoral college system, and I'd prefer that the election be done directly through the popular vote, but as far as I'm concerned Tony, you're just paranoid.

First off, my age should have nothing to do with this.

It does if you're not legally old enough to vote. Which was more than half of Bernie's entire fanbase. Look where that went.

Tony, you're not even registered. You have as much right to discuss the US presidential elections as LeisureSuit or I do.

The electoral college doesn't work like that, Tony

Whoever wins the states wins the electoral votes from that state. Only exceptions are Nebraska and Makne where it's proportional
Gore V. Bush

Tony, you're not even registered. You have as much right to discuss the US presidential elections as LeisureSuit or I do.

I would register if I saw there was a reason to vote, electoral college makes all votes meaningless.

That's bullstuff, how far are you in deniability?

Are you even old enough to vote?
wtf? he's right you moron. its rare for a delegate to break their pledge

Tony, you're not even registered. You have as much right to discuss the US presidential elections as LeisureSuit or I do.

Gore V. Bush
things like that can happen because of disparities between voting powers of individual states on a national level, on a state level things are still relatively representative (plurality will always be represented), or cus of specific flukes

on average the electoral college ends up choosing the popular candidate, aside from i think two cases where very strange things happened like messed up ballots or four major candidates with no majority

also the supreme court technically chose the winner in bush v gore
« Last Edit: September 19, 2016, 04:56:53 PM by otto-san »

wtf? he's right you moron. its rare for a delegate to break their pledge


Hillary pretty much brings out every corrupt politician. Haven't you paid attention with the super delegate bullstuff?

She's gonna do it with the electoral voters too.

Hillary pretty much brings out every corrupt politician. Haven't you paid attention with the super delegate bullstuff?

She's gonna do it with the electoral voters too.

Again, what evidence suggests that? Bill Clinton didn't do it in 1992 and 1996, Dubya didn't do it in 2000 and 2004, and Obama didn't do it in 2008 and 2012.

If it was that easy for presidential candidates (especially incumbents) to rig the electoral vote like that then why hasn't it happened before?

Are you blind by what goes on by the clinton foundation?

Bill Clinton didn't do it in 1992 and 1996,
maybe not, as opposed to those women