That's bullstuff, how far are you in deniability?
Are you even old enough to vote?
First off, my age should have nothing to do with this. If I can argue a point and I can back it up, then my age doesn't matter.
First off, there's no reason to expect electors to not follow their states' popular vote. Thre were no faithless electors in 2012, nor in 2008. In 2004, one dumbass from Minnesota cast their vote for the Democratic vice candidate. In 2000, one elector from DC didn't cast a vote as a form of protest against the district's lack of representation.
You can go back through the years and find examples, but there's no chance of a giant faithless elector wave that would hand the presidency to Hillary. Despite numerous instances of faithlessness as of 2015, faithless electors have never come close to affecting the results or ultimate outcome of any other presidential election. Twenty-nine states have laws against such a thing. And let's not pretend that such a swing wouldn't cause controversy, which is why electors won't conspirate to do it.
I'm no fan of the electoral college system, and I'd prefer that the election be done directly through the popular vote, but as far as I'm concerned Tony, you're just paranoid.