[NEWS] whoops we passed the Carbon Tipping Point For Good

[Insert Name Here²]

Ciest, don't turn this into a "post a sorse xddd" argument please

[Ad Bot]

[Ceist]

Ciest, don't turn this into a "post a sorse xddd" argument please

then stop letting Tony continue being a spaz and defending him.

[Goku®]

what does the mean for me and my fans and the rest of the earths population

[Insert Name Here²]

then stop letting Tony continue being a spaz and defending him.

??? I'm not defending him. You asked for a source so I quoted a post that had one, and you're still complaining lol

Ciest, don't turn this into a "post a sorse xddd" argument please

[Nix the Glaceon]

so you're telling me that the >800 F temperature on Venus has nothing to do with its thick carbon dioxide atmosphere, even though Mercury is cooler despite being closer to the sun? wow. It's good we have scientists here to disprove such crazy allegations.

-ahem-
Mercury, despite being much closer to the sun than Venus, is actually alot cooler. This is because Mercury has too thin of an atmosphere to trap heat inside it. Venus, however, has an extremely thick atmosphere, which means there are much more greenhouse gasses in it. This traps much more heat than Mercury does. Venus also rotates slower than Mercury, so one side gets cooked for a while before the other side does.

or, basically, you're dumb and should learn the BASICS of astronomy before making such infantile theories.

ot: damn this is actually pretty concerning

[Ceist]

??? I'm not defending him. You asked for a source so I quoted a post that had one, and you're still complaining lol

If you really didn't want to argue you would've have simply left it alone. I asked Tony for a source. This is like the umpteenth topic he's posted that is "news" and doesn't have a source in the OP.

-ahem-
Mercury, despite being much closer to the sun than Venus, is actually alot cooler. This is because Mercury has too thin of an atmosphere to trap heat inside it. Venus, however, has an extremely thick atmosphere, which means there are much more greenhouse gasses in it. This traps much more heat than Mercury does. Venus also rotates slower than Mercury, so one side gets cooked for a while before the other side does.

or, basically, you're dumb and should learn the BASICS of astronomy before making such infantile theories.

He literally acknowledged this. Quit being a condescending starfish.

[otto-san]

-ahem-
Mercury, despite being much closer to the sun than Venus, is actually alot cooler. This is because Mercury has too thin of an atmosphere to trap heat inside it. Venus, however, has an extremely thick atmosphere, which means there are much more greenhouse gasses in it. This traps much more heat than Mercury does. Venus also rotates slower than Mercury, so one side gets cooked for a while before the other side does.

or, basically, you're dumb and should learn the BASICS of astronomy before making such infantile theories.

That What He Was Got Damn Tryna Saying Bro

[SeventhSandwich]

Mercury, despite being much closer to the sun than Venus, is actually alot cooler. This is because Mercury has too thin of an atmosphere to trap heat inside it. Venus, however, has an extremely thick atmosphere, which means there are much more greenhouse gasses in it. This traps much more heat than Mercury does. Venus also rotates slower than Mercury, so one side gets cooked for a while before the other side does.

Good job correcting him by restating, pretty much word for word, exactly what he said in his post.

[Bisjac]

if you care to read the details of it, go google it.

we are discussing this hear on blockland forums. and discussing it with what others have posted on the subject.

[Eon]

or, basically, you're dumb and should learn the BASICS of astronomy before making such infantile theories.

must be pretty bad being that pretentious and handicapped at the same time

[Insert Name Here²]

If you really didn't want to argue you would've have simply left it alone.

You could've not posted at all too, except you decided to act like an ass and try to instigate an argument with tony over sources, even though 4 of them were already posted

If you're going to start stuff for literally no reason, then forget off

[Nix the Glaceon]

sorry didn't see the posts between don't hit me

[espio100]

So whats so bad about this besides that the sea level will rise by not even a millineter?

[ßlöükfáce]

If you really didn't want to argue you would've have simply left it alone. I asked Tony for a source. This is like the umpteenth topic he's posted that is "news" and doesn't have a source in the OP.

tony does it on purpose to annoy people

[Ceist]

You could've not posted at all too, except you decided to act like an ass and try to instigate an argument with tony over sources, even though 4 of them were already posted

If you're going to start stuff for literally no reason, then forget off

I always ask Tony for a source when he doesn't post a source. I virtually ignore almost all of his other posts. And if you payed attention, I acknowledged the sources posted by ANOTHER user.
I was going to avoid sounding condescending, but you have no idea what you're talking about and I'm done trying to explain this to you.