Author Topic: legopepper's admin team and wallhack accusations  (Read 13252 times)

Put the link to this thread on the discord to let them know, response:

>double post

Of course that admins of a server that has been accused would say that "we saw it and nothing bad went down"

no admins listed

still not explaining how we did it indicated wallhack

no further explanation or debating of points because lol drama

  what unfathomable reason do you dregs have for advising op to stay away from drama. if its something like "don't go you'll embarrass yourself" if op is going to embarrass himself hes going to do it and i dont see why drama specifically is off limits for loving up because anyone who forgets up will get dragged to it eventually.  if you are trying to prevent him from taking in some negative "drama energy" cynicism or some stuff the posters that use drama use every other board and their posting styles do not change as they cycle through threads, you will not avoid drama if you do not go to drama. "don't go to drama" is a kneejerk reaction given by idiots who think drama is inherently bad. if anything not going to drama is a bad idea since all of that information about malicious users and other people you should preemptively ban from everything will go to waste.
this is for you


oops
using blhack*
if you were using wallhacks as well, based on the wall size, you probably wouldn't be able to see his player model in your FOV
and also other players vouched that he did teleport, with him denying, eventually responding with that he did, defending and changing his point multiple times
i also think there's some bias as well, other people reported that he went into the house first, and after you guys jumped on the bandwagon he started targetting you two for wallhacking, he also changed the events to not allow anybody in but he "claims" that he went to go out and fix them later..which is oddly suspicious.

so finally /support

im pretty sure their administration didn't even read our ban appeal on their forums because they kept asking questions that were already addressed in the op

also we're sure that amir has a grudge against DestroyerOfBlocks because his group killed Amir's 3 month old character and by old i mean his character existed on that server for a total of 3 months

What is this some sort of passive aggressive insult? I can smell your sarcasm from here.


What is this some sort of passive aggressive insult? I can smell your sarcasm from here.
who are you responding to

based on their discord they don't seem to understand the implications of calling people hackers



i posted the one without the combined first and second parts of the original thing

not to stir up anything but legopepper said he's looking into it
Quote
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont": rip lmao
LegoPepper: ?
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont": you got drama'd pretty quick
LegoPepper: on the bl forums?
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont": ya
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont": https://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=303538.0
LegoPepper: figures, we're gonna ban someone and hes gonna get ansy about it
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont": just as a general question do you trust amir
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont": i mean after the entire cca stuff going down
"gay cigarette who can spell but wont" has changed their name to [metario@homebox ~]$.
LegoPepper: I don't really want to comment on anything b/c I don't feel like spreading more drama and gossip
LegoPepper: but just know we're looking at it and what not
[metario@homebox ~]$: nice

again they don't seem to understand that people who aren't hackers don't like being called hackers