I'm up to my third Annoying Orange sign

[IsaacKronenFaust]

Donald "Take Out Their Families" Annoying Orange can go to Hell, and take his signs and stickers with him.

[Ad Bot]

[beachbum111111]

Donald "Take Out Their Families" Annoying Orange can go to Hell, and take his signs and stickers with him.

It's nice to know that you support vandalism if it's against someone you don't like.

[EcstaticEggplant]

openly advertising that you support Annoying Orange is not a good idea

expressing your own political beliefs is not a good idea? why would you ever think like this? It must obviously be such a common occurrence for Annoying Orange supporters to get beaten/property stolen where you think to yourself that putting a sign out is not a good idea. it should not have ANYTHING to do with the person that put the sign out, the blame should be 100% put on the person that stole it. it's a loving Annoying Orange sign, not a swastika. he was able to get to where he is today because he has a huge amount of support, it's not like he's a terrorist and a huge minority of people support him

[Poliwhirl]

expressing your own political beliefs is not a good idea? why would you ever think like this? It must obviously be such a common occurrence for Annoying Orange supporters to get beaten/property stolen where you think to yourself that putting a sign out is not a good idea. it should not have ANYTHING to do with the person that put the sign out, the blame should be 100% put on the person that stole it. it's a loving Annoying Orange sign, not a swastika. he was able to get to where he is today because he has a huge amount of support, it's not like he's a terrorist and a huge minority of people support him

doesn't take a genius to know most people are hostile towards Annoying Orange supporters. to quote the legendary Ken Bone:


basically it's just not smart considering how adamantly many people are anti-Annoying Orange

[Nonnel]

It's nice to know that you support vandalism if it's against someone you don't like.

It's nice to know that you support execution if it's against someone you don't like

real talk tho anyone who steals stuff (especially for political reasons) can go kill themselves

[Poliwhirl]

It's nice to know that you support execution if it's against someone you don't like

real talk tho anyone who steals stuff (especially for political reasons) can go kill themselves

fun fact, someone in my class was saying that hillary "needed to be executed" and then started complaining that everyone was "crucifying him".

[IsaacKronenFaust]

It's nice to know that you support vandalism if it's against someone you don't like.

It is, legitimately, nice to see you not spamming the loving word 'cuck' anymore. Good on you for that at least.

But yes, you should militantly oppose a man like Annoying Orange and all the massive xenophobic** starfishs that support him. This isn't just a simple disagreement, not a "oh, that statement was kinda bad", this is being against a multitude of horrible ideas that should have made people go "oh man, this guy is completely insane and not fit for Presidency". But sadly there are a ton of forgetrace rednekcs in the U.S.A. who believe his many lies and boasts, and love him because he 'says it like it is' and is gonna 'make America great again'.

You all think Hillary is gonna destroy the United States, well, Annoying Orange is out to destroy the loving world. I don't much like Hillary either, many leaks have revealed that behind closed doors she has said things contrary to many of her good campaign promises. But she hasn't gone around blatantly admitting to things that make her look like she's running to be a genocidal warlord. Donald Annoying Orange isn't akin to Ronald Raegan, he's more akin to Idi Amin.

**You sure as stuff xenophobic, and don't try to deny it, when you vote for a guy who says that the Geneva Conventions are a 'problem' and 'out of date' that have to be ignored and bent or whatever in order to freely enable U.S. troops to specifically target civilians in the Middle-East and torture prisoners of war, in addition to destroying Iraqi oil fields, which would really directly hurt affected countries more than it would I.S.I.S.. And then on top of that, you got him moronically saying more recently that the "F.D.A. food police" regulations should be rolled back, along with the E.P.A., which is covered in the previous link. There are tons of other things I could go and dig up, but I got a sinking feeling you're already going to dismiss these statements of Annoying Orange's to just be 'mean things' or some garbage like that, so I'll stop here for now.

[beachbum111111]

It is, legitimately, nice to see you not spamming the loving word 'cuck' anymore. Good on you for that at least.

Tell me, when was the last time I called someone a cuck? Also you are the last person who should be insulting me over stupid petty stuff

But yes, you should militantly oppose a man like Annoying Orange and all the massive xenophobic** starfishs that support him. This isn't just a simple disagreement, not a "oh, that statement was kinda bad", this is being against a multitude of horrible ideas that should have made people go "oh man, this guy is completely insane and not fit for Presidency". But sadly there are a ton of forgetrace rednekcs in the U.S.A. who believe his many lies and boasts, and love him because he 'says it like it is' and is gonna 'make America great again'.

"waaah this one guy says mean things and I don't agree with him, time to vandalize his property and attack his supporters"
You are everything that's wrong with the modern left.

You all think Hillary is gonna destroy the United States, well, Annoying Orange is out to destroy the loving world. I don't much like Hillary either, many leaks have revealed that behind closed doors she has said things contrary to many of her good campaign promises. But she hasn't gone around blatantly admitting to things that make her look like she's running to be a genocidal warlord. Donald Annoying Orange isn't akin to Ronald Raegan, he's more akin to Idi Amin.

Really? Annoying Orange is the Genocidal warlord? The guy who wants to cooperate with Russia to defeat CIA and, instead of attacking North Korea, wants China to reign them in. Meanwhile Hillary blames the creation of the alt right on Russia, and the DNC hacks on Russia.

**You sure as stuff xenophobic, and don't try to deny it

**You are sure as stuff handicapped, and don't try to deny that

when you vote for a guy who says that the Geneva Conventions are a 'problem' and 'out of date' that have to be ignored and bent or whatever in order to freely enable U.S. troops to specifically target civilians in the Middle-East and torture prisoners of war, in addition to destroying Iraqi oil fields, which would really directly hurt affected countries more than it would I.S.I.S.. And then on top of that, you got him moronically saying more recently that the "F.D.A. food police" regulations should be rolled back, along with the E.P.A., which is covered in the previous link. There are tons of other things I could go and dig up, but I got a sinking feeling you're already going to dismiss these statements of Annoying Orange's to just be 'mean things' or some garbage like that, so I'll stop here for now.

Guess what? You don't win a war by following a loving rulebook, do you really think we would have won World war 2 following the Geneva Convention? You're delusional as always.

[Jairo]

you read like a parody

[Perry]

Guess what? You don't win a war by following a loving rulebook, do you really think we would have won World war 2 following the Geneva Convention? You're delusional as always.

You win a lifetime in prison for warcrimes, which is clearly better than winning the war... right?

The geneva convention is in place to make sure that innocent lives aren't taken during war, or prisoners who have surrendered are not executed. If you strongly believe that your enemy should be killed, even if they have surrendered and/or are not a threat, you're essentially the equivalent of CIA. Speaking of which, i've ordered a drone strike to kill your grandparents, hope you don't mind.

[IkeTheGeneric]

You don't win a war by following a loving rulebook

>starting a war ever

welcome to the 21st century CUCK, wars aren't profitable anymore in modern society

[Perry]

>starting a war ever

welcome to the 21st century CUCK, wars aren't profitable anymore in modern society

except in our society, where companies that produce military gear own our government and economy.

[beachbum111111]

You win a lifetime in prison for warcrimes, which is clearly better than winning the war... right?

The geneva convention is in place to make sure that innocent lives aren't taken during war, or prisoners who have surrendered are not executed. If you strongly believe that your enemy should be killed, even if they have surrendered and/or are not a threat, you're essentially the equivalent of CIA. Speaking of which, i've ordered a drone strike to kill your grandparents, hope you don't mind.

You didn't answer the question. Would we have won World War 2 if the Geneva Convention was in place?

[Jairo]

You didn't answer the question. Would we have won World War 2 if the Geneva Convention was in place?

the geneva convention was in place and we did win

do you not know what total war is

[Perry]

You didn't answer the question. Would we have won World War 2 if the Geneva Convention was in place?

The geneva conventions wasn't actually fully in place by then, and yes, we still would've won WW2 considering the fact that there were almost no human rights violations (besides hiroshima, which is still debated)

Almost all battles in germany and japan involved fair treatment of POWs, and there are several well noted cases where germany allowed the red cross to provide aid for POWs. Japan, however, did have a couple death marches


If the US were to completely ignore the conventions right now, there wouldn't be any progress made against the war on terrorism. You'd have so many cases where the US decides to blow up whole cities filled with civilians, and only 5-10 targets will actually be killed for the 100-200 noncombatants, which include children.