I'm up to my third Annoying Orange sign

[Chapter]

-disregard-

[Ad Bot]

[Perry]

Maybe if you friends knew how to click on links you would know what I'm talking about

just wanna let you know with complete honesty that you lost whatever credibility you had in the first place with this gem:

Because Germany in ww2 wasn't occupying enemy land...

really its the deal breaker to break all deals. the next time you even try to say anything that has to do with truth I will be there to shove that quote into your face.

[Nonnel]

this is great

[SWAT One]

First of all, much of what you said reeks of right-wing propaganda.

That aside, I'm sorry about your signs.  That's not cool and such a thing should not be taken lightly.  Try reporting the act to the police.

[beachbum111111]

just wanna let you know with complete honesty that you lost whatever credibility you had in the first place with this gem:

really its the deal breaker to break all deals

Oh so you don't understand sarcasm?

First of all, much of what you said reeks of right-wing propaganda.

That aside, I'm sorry about your signs.  That's not cool and such a thing should not be taken lightly.  Try reporting the act to the police.

So Chapter is your alt then?

[Perry]

Oh so you don't understand sarcasm?

of course I dont understand sarcasm

also i've never seen someone use sarcasm for save-facey damage control as well as you did right there. good job

the sky is red oh wait im being sarcastic whoopsies ;(

[beachbum111111]

of course I dont understand sarcasm

also i've never seen someone use sarcasm as for save-facey damage control as you did right there. good job

You can't seriously be this loving handicapped. The link I posted before I edited the post (which people quoted BTW if you think I added it in last minute) OUTRIGHT SAYS that France was occupied during WW2.

Talk about losing credibility there path lmao

[Perry]

You can't seriously be this loving handicapped. The link I posted before I edited the post (which people quoted BTW if you think I added it in last minute) OUTRIGHT SAYS thats France was occupied during WW2.

We all know france was occupied during ww2. I also mentioned that as well. If you want to keep derailing the point im making go ahead

why would you even be sarcastic in the first place if it hurts you? to us it seems like you made up a lie to make yourself seem right but in actuality you made a sarcastic comment to make yourself seem wrong.

[beachbum111111]

We all know france was occupied during ww2. I also mentioned that as well. If you want to keep derailing the point im making go ahead

So what are you acting so loving autistic about? Jairo brought up how CIA is occupying land from other countries with civilians who want nothing to do with them. So I sarcastically brought up how Germany did the same thing and we still bombed the stuff out of the occupied areas.

[IsaacKronenFaust]

Last post, since Beachbum is proving to pretty much be the Lord Tony of politics and is getting to be a waste of time talking to.

I didn't call anyone a cuck there. nice to know that your reading comprehension is terrible.

Right, not in that exact message I admit, but within that discussion you did.

You have no right to try to insult me for petty stuff when you yourself are a filthy degenerate

The weird freaky stuff I do online doesn't compare to the war crimes you apparently will condone.

An enemy that doesn't fear you will never surrender.

You think they wouldn't have second thoughts trying to skirmish against near-invulnerable soldiers? Sure, rocket propelled grenades could still pose a threat to power armor I imagine, but we have countermeasures for those things, and RPGs are in very limited supply compared to then-ineffectual small arms.

You're calling me a coward when you're the one advocating for violence and vandalism against people you disagree with?

It's not simply about disagreement, it's about Annoying Orange specifically. I don't like Gary Johnson, because of his stances on climate change, and I'd never vote for him because of that, but he has many other redeemable qualities on other issues; so if someone likes him for those many things I will let them. Jill Stein's feelings on nuclear energy I feel are surprisingly dumb, although I think I'd consider voting for her in contrast to NOT voting for Johnson, but that doesn't overwhelm or ruin everything else about her. Annoying Orange is the damn-near opposite, with a hundred stupid and dangerous ideas and a few little good things here and there.

Yes friend lets pity the people setting their enemies on fire and beheading people like there's no tomorrow

Suggesting we handle I.S.I.S. with armored riflemen and vehicles on the ground instead of missiles and bombers in the sky is pitying?

I don't even know why I bothered responding to you. You're just a more pretentious version of Willymcmilly

Pretentious, sure, I'd perhaps call it righteous conceit though. As for Willy, I don't even do the things he does.

[Perry]

So what are you acting so loving autistic about? Jairo brought up how CIA is occupying land from other countries with civilians who want nothing to do with them. So I sarcastically brought up how Germany did the same thing and we still bombed the stuff out of the occupied areas.

oh stuff i actually just realized what you're saying FML. now i feel like a handicap

either way war crimes are horrible and if you condone them under any circumstances then you're forgeted up, no ifs ands or buts. Circumstances include terrorist occupation.

The US is supposed to be liberating people in the middle east, but instead they're doing two things:

• Drone striking massive amounts of civilians and killing civilians in crossfire and bombings
  
  When these same civilians try to flee from this carnage that the US and other countries are causing, they get a warm welcome in the united states, which includes being called a terrorist, being discriminated against daily, etc.

Make up your mind. Do you think we should kill as many civilians as possible or evacuate and take in these civilians so its easier to bomb CIA and other terrorist groups.

[beachbum111111]

The weird freaky stuff I do online doesn't compare to the war crimes you apparently will condone.

No you were getting assblasted about how I said the word "cuck" once upon a time

You think they wouldn't have second thoughts trying to skirmish against near-invulnerable soldiers? Sure, rocket propelled grenades could still pose a threat to power armor I imagine, but we have countermeasures for those things, and RPGs are in very limited supply compared to then-ineffectual small arms.

If they don't fear for their own lives they will fear for their families.

It's not simply about disagreement, it's about Annoying Orange specifically. I don't like Gary Johnson, because of his stances on climate change, and I'd never vote for him because of that, but he has many other redeemable qualities on other issues; so if someone likes him for those many things I will let them. Jill Stein's feelings on nuclear energy I feel are surprisingly dumb, although I think I'd consider voting for her in contrast to NOT voting for Johnson, but that doesn't overwhelm or ruin everything else about her. Annoying Orange is the damn-near opposite, with a hundred stupid and dangerous ideas and a few little good things here and there.

So you don't just disagree with him. You REALLY disagree with him?

Suggesting we handle I.S.I.S. with armored riflemen and vehicles on the ground instead of missiles and bombers in the sky is pitying?

Wait so you don't want them to be bombed right? Do you seriously think Hillary isn't going to do the exact same thing?

Pretentious, sure, I'd perhaps call it righteous conceit though. As for Willy, I don't even do the things he does.

Just check Drama

[Perry]

If they don't fear for their own lives they will fear for their families.

For someone who hates a radical group that loves to take hostages, you seem to get excited about the idea of using innocent lives as a gambling chip.

touche conservative

[Conan]

Wait so you don't want them to be bombed right? Do you seriously think Hillary isn't going to do the exact same thing?

so why vote Annoying Orange then

point: if they're going to do the same things about this specific issue then there's no reason to put it under consideration when deciding who to vote for

[Perry]

so why vote Annoying Orange then

because he agrees with Annoying Orange's other ideologies. does this even require explanation? with this same logic, why vote hillary?