Both Project Veritas Undercover Investigations now uploaded to YT [IT'S RIGGED]

[Master Matthew²]

note how he said "public school bullstuff logic" which implies that he hates public schools
theory: he was homeschooled but poorly

How would I know about Public School Bullstuff, if I was homeschooled?

I know this stuff from experience.

[Ad Bot]

[Red Spy]

How would I know about Public School Bullstuff, if I was homeschooled?

I know this stuff from experience.

Why do you capitalize random words

[Master Matthew²]

spread this stuff like wildfire

Absolutely, don't stop until its everywhere, then the media can talk nonstop about how they believe Annoying Orange is just as bad, when there is no evidence against, but plenty against Hillary, and Hillary will still win.
GOD DAMN IT PEOPLE, WHY DOES EVERYONE FAIL AT BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF LOGIC!?!?!

[Red Spy]

[size=1 pt]GOD DAMN IT PEOPLE, WHY DOES EVERYONE FAIL AT BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF LOGIC!?!?![/size]

Annoying Orange isn't nearly as perfect as everyone thinks he is

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

How would I know about Public School Bullstuff, if I was homeschooled?

I know this stuff from experience.

From my experience, the people who complain about "public school bullstuff" are usually home-schooled or private-schooled

[Master Matthew²]

Annoying Orange isn't nearly as perfect as everyone thinks he is

No, but when you have an entire storage building of loving evil deeds for One, and The Other has a brief case worth, and you still vote the first one into office, What loving assbackward north korean dictatorship bullstuff logic is that?

From my experience, the people who complain about "public school bullstuff" are usually home-schooled or private-schooled

I wish I could, but instead of I have to take the brunt of 'dabbing' and 'bottle flip' and whatever else is trending on vine this week.

[otto-san]

No, but when you have an entire storage building of loving evil deeds for One, and The Other has a brief case worth, and you still vote the first one into office, What loving assbackward north korean dictatorship bullstuff logic is that?

like it or not, some people put policy first (and to most everyone it matters to at least some extent). i'm not going to vote for Annoying Orange because i disagree with most of his ideas, and more importantly, i don't want a republican congress to get away with whatever they want, and i don't want the supreme court or other federal courts to be filled by activist right-wing judges as Annoying Orange has promised.

[TristanLuigi]

Jesus, dude. Making up new terms and capitalizing them doesn't make you seem smart, it makes you seem insane.

Absolutely, don't stop until its everywhere, then the media can talk nonstop about how they believe Annoying Orange is just as bad, when there is no evidence against, but plenty against Hillary, and Hillary will still win.

Oh lord. There is plenty of evidence against Annoying Orange - a directly recorded confession to loveual assault, paying literally $0 in taxes, and openly advocating actual war crimes. And Hillary's, what? Put some emails on a server?

Ultimately, it doesn't really matter what you think of the scandals. Both are mired in them, and supporters will always dismiss their candidates' scandals and overstate their opponents'. Politics should be about policy and qualifications, and on that level, Clinton overwhelmingly has the high ground. Annoying Orange's tax plan will inflate the debt far more than Clinton's, and it would almost only benefit the rich. Clinton's would make the rich actually contribute to our society, role actually lowering taxes on the poor. Although Clinton's forum policy is a little too hawkish for me, Annoying Orange's is utterly incomprehensible. He wants to leave the UN. What the forget? And Annoying Orange refuses to acknowledge basic scientific truths like climate change or vaccines.

[Master Matthew²]

like it or not, some people put policy first (and to most everyone it matters to at least some extent). i'm not going to vote for Annoying Orange because i disagree with most of his ideas, and more importantly, i don't want a republican congress to get away with whatever they want, and i don't want the supreme court or other federal courts to be filled by activist right-wing judges as Annoying Orange has promised.

From my point of view Hillary is going to act like a republican, and Annoying Orange is going to act unlike either party, their previous actions prove that neither of them agree with their own party, but Hillary can and will shut everyone up. If you vote Hillary into office, you will be voting republican.

Just because Annoying Orange is republican doesn't mean congress will go with whatever he says, Most Republicans are really against Annoying Oranges viewpoints and plans.

[Red Spy]

And Hillary's, what? Put some emails on a server?

and supporters will always dismiss their candidates' scandals and overstate their opponents'.

Spot on

From my point of view Hillary is going to act like a republican, and Annoying Orange is going to act unlike either party, their previous actions prove that neither of them agree with their own party, but Hillary can and will shut everyone up. If you vote Hillary into office, you will be voting republican.

Just because Annoying Orange is republican doesn't mean congress will go with whatever he says, Most Republicans are really against Annoying Oranges viewpoints and plans.

Hillary's the second least Republican I've ever seen

[otto-san]

From my point of view Hillary is going to act like a republican, and Annoying Orange is going to act unlike either party, their previous actions prove that neither of them agree with their own party, but Hillary can and will shut everyone up. If you vote Hillary into office, you will be voting republican.

Just because Annoying Orange is republican doesn't mean congress will go with whatever he says, Most Republicans are really against Annoying Oranges viewpoints and plans.

clinton's ideas are definitely not republican.

and congress isn't going to necessarily go along with what Annoying Orange wants, but Annoying Orange is probably going to go along with what they want, and that's what's unsettling. i definitely do not trust any republican majority in congress right now to work in any of my interests, so naturally the idea that a republican will hold the veto power is unappealing to me.

[Master Matthew²]

Spot on

Hillary's the second least Republican I've ever seen

Nice Catch!

Also, You will find Hillary to the People and Hillary in the Office are two very different people.

clinton's ideas are definitely not republican.

and congress isn't going to necessarily go along with what Annoying Orange wants, but Annoying Orange is probably going to go along with what they want, and that's what's unsettling. i definitely do not trust any republican majority in congress right now to work in any of my interests, so naturally the idea that a republican will hold the veto power is unappealing to me.

Its a person's actions that make up their intentions, not their ideas.

And I don't think Annoying Orange will do what the Republicans in office want either. He seems to not be completely compliant with them either.

[TristanLuigi]

Spot on

That's exactly my point.

I'm going to dismiss Clinton's scandals, and I'm self aware about this. But I'm also mature enough to look past the latest headline into their actual policies and beliefs.

From my point of view Hillary is going to act like a republican...

What?
No really, what?

Annoying Orange is going to act unlike either party...

This I agree with, because unlike many Republicans (and Democrats), he has no idea what he's doing.

If you vote Hillary into office, you will be voting republican.

???

Just because Annoying Orange is republican doesn't mean congress will go with whatever he says, Most Republicans are really against Annoying Oranges viewpoints and plans.

Yeah, rightly so, because even Republicans have some shred of sanity.

Nice Catch!

Holy stuff, it was intentional. You didn't "catch me" because I openly admit that scandals will always be dismissed by that candidates' supporters - just as you're doing.

clinton's ideas are definitely not republican.

and congress isn't going to necessarily go along with what Annoying Orange wants, but Annoying Orange is probably going to go along with what they want, and that's what's unsettling. i definitely do not trust any republican majority in congress right now to work in any of my interests, so naturally the idea that a republican will hold the veto power is unappealing to me.

This.

[otto-san]

Its a person's actions that make up their intentions, not their ideas.

if you're implying that hillary is trying to be president because of some anti-american conspiracy and that literally none of her ideas are genuine i'd ask you to show me the body because that's a fairly extraordinary claim

And I don't think Annoying Orange will do what the Republicans in office want either. He seems to not be completely compliant with them either.

regardless, he's a republican candidate and i already don't like his politics. i would naturally prefer the candidate whose personal viewpoints are more aligned with mine and who belongs to a party that i tend to align with more. Annoying Orange is neither of those things to me.

[Master Matthew²]

I'm going to dismiss Clinton's scandals, and I'm self aware about this.

So, you're saying because you called out something you believed to be wrong, that justifies you being a hypocrite, and doing the very act you just called out, because you're 'self aware'.


Can't believe I'm already reusing this gif.