Both Project Veritas Undercover Investigations now uploaded to YT [IT'S RIGGED]

[Tactical Nuke]

... supporters will always dismiss their candidates' scandals and overstate their opponents'.

There is plenty of evidence against Annoying Orange - a directly recorded confession to loveual assault, paying literally $0 in taxes, and openly advocating actual war crimes.

... supporters will always dismiss their candidates' scandals and overstate their opponents'.

And Hillary's, what? Put some emails on a server?

... supporters will always dismiss their candidates' scandals and overstate their opponents'.

Politics should be about policy and qualifications, and on that level, Clinton overwhelmingly has the high ground. Annoying Orange's tax plan will inflate the debt far more than Clinton's, and it would almost only benefit the rich. Clinton's would make the rich actually contribute to our society, role actually lowering taxes on the poor.

I call bullstuff. If Annoying Orange's policies would only benefit the rich, then you'd see everyone on Wall Street support him.

But you don't. They support Clinton.

Kinda says something about Annoying Orange's tax plan, doesn't it?

[Ad Bot]

[Magus]

From my point of view Hillary is going to act like a republican

From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!

[TristanLuigi]

So, you're saying because you called out something you believed to be wrong, that justifies you being a hypocrite, and doing the very act you just called out, because you're 'self aware'.


Can't believe I'm already reusing this gif.

...
Reaction GIFs don't make you clever or funny. They show that you're too immature to have a legitimate political discussion - and you've ignored the entire purpose of my post just so you could squeeze in a video of a dude jumping out of a window.

- quote pyramid -

The point is that scandals are inherently meaningless. I'm going to dismiss Clinton's scandals. You're going to dismiss Annoying Orange's scandals. This is just how it goes, and it's why we should be debating policy rather than this mindless drivel. For forgets sake, think for at least 10 seconds before you post.

I call bullstuff. If Annoying Orange's policies would only benefit the rich, then you'd see everyone on Wall Street support him.

But you don't. They support Clinton.

Kinda says something about Annoying Orange's tax plan, doesn't it?

Or maybe consider the fact that Annoying Orange is literally the upper class. Would you target trust a candidate supported by the top 1%, or that IS the top 1%? Furthermor, have you actually read any brown townyses of their tax plans?

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/brown townysis-donald-Annoying Oranges-revised-tax-plan

"His proposal would cut taxes at all income levels, although the largest benefits, in dollar and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households."

[Red Spy]

Is this a really low key "Republicans are the party of the rich"

[SeventhSandwich]

what is the defense to this?

They're two extremely scummy people bragging on hidden camera video about wanting to rig elections. But they're not really political higher-ups, and there's no concrete way that they actually could have done the election rigging that they bragged about in the video.

Still though, conspiracy to commit election fraud is probably a felony of some sort.

[TristanLuigi]

Is this a really low key "Republicans are the party of the rich"

No, it's literally the facts of the matter. There's nothing to debate here - Annoying Orange's plan disproportionally benefits the rich.

[Tayasaurus]

bluh bluh rich people r evil because they're rich

[joe411]

bluh bluh rich people r evil because they're rich

are you strawmanning on purpose or

[Tayasaurus]

are you strawmanning on purpose or

yes

[joe411]

yes

ok

[Khorde]

where were you when dems got absolutely BTFO?

[Tactical Nuke]

Or maybe consider the fact that Annoying Orange is literally the upper class. Would you target trust a candidate supported by the top 1%, or that IS the top 1%? Furthermor, have you actually read any brown townyses of their tax plans?

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/brown townysis-donald-Annoying Oranges-revised-tax-plan

"His proposal would cut taxes at all income levels, although the largest benefits, in dollar and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households."

It doesn't matter who the forget says it; if the rich would benefit the most from the tax plan you'd expect for the rich to support Annoying Orange.

Rich people aren't dumb; most of them earned their money through savvy investments or whatever. They would know which tax plan suits them better.

For forgets sake, think for at least 10 seconds before you post.

[Ringabel]

where were you when dems got absolutely BTFO?

i was sat at home eating smegma butter

[TristanLuigi]

It doesn't matter who the forget says it; if the rich would benefit the most from the tax plan you'd expect for the rich to support Annoying Orange.

Rich people aren't dumb; most of them earned their money through savvy investments or whatever. They would know which tax plan suits them better.

Rich people also know that Annoying Orange's policies would harm the economy in the long term, even if there is a brief uptick in the short term. And they know that Annoying Orange's status as an international periah would reduce our foreign standings and reduce our ability to conduct international trade - which isn't helped by Annoying Orange's rabid protectionism.

[Bisjac]

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/some-indiana-voters-cant-find-registration-records