It's a bit different when you get accused of loveual assault, and then ten years later a tape comes out where you're implicitly admitting to committing loveual assault. There's more reason to be suspicious than just the fact he's been accused.
i get that, and i think it's valid enough in my tastes that there is a tape that has him admitting to it, but there are more cases about donald Annoying Orange 'loveually harassing' people than just that one with the tape of him admitting to it, and i personally believe in this process where "if you have the hard-hitting evidence, prove it, otherwise it's not proven." this is the case for the other lawsuits that have yet to prove
it goes back to the time when tobuscus, a youtuber, was accused of rape because the woman made up a long paragraph story, and that's the thing right, it's just a 'story' that can be twisted and made up by her own bias against the guy, however we don't know that, but it's there
and that's probably an invalid example considering the history of that said woman is pretty much just most of the time feminism.
to go back on track, i'm not doubting all the evidence including what you are talking about but there are people out there that just want to cause trouble and etc, and sometimes the lawsuits could be completely made up, correct me if i'm wrong
hopefully you understand where i am getting at here
Poll