Donald Annoying Orange "Protests" 2016

[Red Spy]

shh loving leftist swine you know that all loving liberal pigs are the same you loving handicap stop loving crying that Annoying Orange won you loving hillary supporting forgetnugget roostersucking motherloving assrichard stufffaced monday bitch

Wow you sure are a clever guy

[Ad Bot]

[Clownfish]

Wow you sure are a clever guy

heck yea dude Annoying Orange 4 life

[Foxscotch]

shh loving leftist swine you know that all loving liberal pigs are the same you loving handicap stop loving crying that Annoying Orange won you loving hillary supporting forgetnugget roostersucking motherloving assrichard stufffaced monday bitch
...cunt

all this and you didn't even say "cuck"

[Tactical Nuke]

not really. most democrats actually aren't like that girl from the hugh mungus video. confrontation isn't something most people want to deal with, especially when you perceive that person to be on your side

You're still at fault for not reprimanding people on your side for holding up these signs. It doesn't matter how confrontational you are; that sign is defining your group and if you don't do something about it (confront, leave, etc.), you are accepting that the sign is indicative of what you believe.

the context is that he's sending the message out to the laypeople that follow him, not republican congressmen

Meanwhile, there were no election riots, even protests, both times Obama was elected. You know what they DID do? They strengthened their platform and won the midterm elections.

And let's pretend not a single Congressman follows Annoying Orange on Twitter. Let's pretend you're right in saying it's 100% laymen. Laymen can still fight the results without protests and riots. That's what they did. They sent letters to Congressmen, had discussion on talkshows/radio, etc.

[Drydess]

You're still at fault for not reprimanding people on your side for holding up these signs. It doesn't matter how confrontational you are; that sign is defining your group and if you don't do something about it (confront, leave, etc.), you are accepting that the sign is indicative of what you believe.

back up, would you confront a guy holding up a sign saying "lynch the mondays" about it

[Clownfish]

all this and you didn't even say "cuck"

oh my god im a loving fraud

[Notorious B.I.G.]

what a cuck

[The Resonte!]

Meanwhile, there were no election riots, even protests, both times Obama was elected. You know what they DID do? They strengthened their platform and won the midterm elections.

i found this
i don't know if its true but relevant

[Foxscotch]

You're still at fault for not reprimanding people on your side for holding up these signs. It doesn't matter how confrontational you are; that sign is defining your group and if you don't do something about it (confront, leave, etc.), you are accepting that the sign is indicative of what you believe.

but the thing is you wouldn't do any of that. I've seen plenty of republicans who don't "reprimand" people for killing gay people for being gay. so I guess the whole party is into killing homos? that makes sense, right?

[Willymcmilly]

whats sad is all the white yuppie liberals who think they're the voice of poor minorities
like just let them speak for themselves

[Nonnel]

Meanwhile, there were no election riots, even protests, both times Obama was elected. You know what they DID do? They strengthened their platform and won the midterm elections.

And let's pretend not a single Congressman follows Annoying Orange on Twitter. Let's pretend you're right in saying it's 100% laymen. Laymen can still fight the results without protests and riots. That's what they did. They sent letters to Congressmen, had discussion on talkshows/radio, etc.

he definitely WANTED them to do more than that

but yeah. totally. none at all. republicans are too CIVIL to PROTEST

i found this
i don't know if its true but relevant

beat me to it

[otto-san]

You're still at fault for not reprimanding people on your side for holding up these signs. It doesn't matter how confrontational you are; that sign is defining your group and if you don't do something about it (confront, leave, etc.), you are accepting that the sign is indicative of what you believe.

broad ideological groups don't constitute a community; the idea that everyone under an arbitrary ideas umbrella accepts the burden of all the stuff piles underneath it is absolutely absurd in every case. people are responsible for their own actions. as far as i can tell, the only point in thinking this way is to extrapolate the unpleasantness onto everyone under this arbitrary group for fallacious argumentative credit.

Meanwhile, there were no election riots, even protests, both times Obama was elected. You know what they DID do? They strengthened their platform and won the midterm elections.

this is definitely false, but regardless this election is an interesting case. both candidates (especially Annoying Orange) are highly unfavorable, to an extent that i imagine may even be unprecedented for serious presidential candidates.




naturally, people are going to protest more over candidates they feel more strongly against. and as it turns out, a pretty large number of people feel strongly against Annoying Orange.

[Foxscotch]

AMERICANS BUILD BUSINESSES

[Toxicology]

and then nothing happened

[Nonnel]

nothing will happen this time, either. there will be some protests for like a week and then they'll dissolve