Author Topic: We Have Been Challenged (Read 18170 times)

laremere · February 20, 2008, 06:14:43 PM

Lets stop pushing him around and actually build this thing.

Quote from: laremere on February 20, 2008, 06:09:13 PM

For the map: how wide should the dish be?

Ad Bot · Advertisement

dUMBELLS · February 20, 2008, 06:19:09 PM

Pro: Using "big" words doesn't make you sound more intelligent when it, in fact, lets us know that you are trying to prove to us you are mature, which you are not.
Everyone else: Good luck on that build.

Slow EDIT!: Pro, shoving pictures of your build at us taken from different angles won't help convince us that we can't do it. So stop.

Slower edit:
First he said "NO INTERIORS : You must use terrain for dish"
Then he said "Don't forget you need the wires too HEHE"
Then he said "You have to build it by hand"
Then he said "DEADLINE APRIL" (I bet he chuckled there too)

You are really trying to "hurt" our hopes and attitude, well your posts so far have not changed a thing. You can chuckle to yourself at this aswell if you find it "funny". I know for a fact you haven't been playing for three years.

Pimpin · February 20, 2008, 06:34:01 PM

Why in the HELL would we want to waste our time duplicating an RTB build to prove a point? It IS possible to build that in retail, yes (and if you doubt that you're a moron), but the time and effort it would take would be immense, and the outcome isn't worth it. Aside from that, the build isn't anything special anyway, the only thing it has going for it is its size, but what the build boils down to is just stretchy stretchy lattices.

The differences between Retail and RTB are clear, and to compare them would be idiotic; the games are totally different from one another. Go play RTB if you want to build realistically, play Retail if you want to build with LEGOs.

Oh and I read like 1/4th of the thread so if it wasn't already an RTB vs. Retail war I guess I just started one :/.

NINJAEDIT: ProBuilder you're a friend.

SLOWEREDIT: What the hell, his build doesn't even look like the real thing. Hey buddy, why don't you focus on actually building yours ACCURATELY before you start flaunting the build like you're Jesus Christ.

EVENSLOOOOWEREDIT: Hey Wedge you seem to enjoy researching. Remind me to come to you if I need homework help :D.

BlueGreen · February 20, 2008, 06:46:16 PM

I think Wedge just likes to prove people wrong.

FlyGuy45 · February 20, 2008, 07:14:39 PM

Guys, you can't use your hands. Sorry.

frodo091 · February 20, 2008, 07:25:29 PM

Quote from: FlyGuy45 on February 20, 2008, 07:14:39 PM

Guys, you can't use your hands. Sorry.

Shit! My nose is still sore from the last hands-free build-off!

Bisjac · February 20, 2008, 07:32:54 PM

Why is THAT the challenge? It sucks...
Why couldn't those noobs make something cool?

+Singapura+ · February 20, 2008, 07:37:53 PM

Um... Why don't the people that want to build it, do what they want... The ones who don't, don't... And everyone ignores all furthur posts by ching chong until they're done... � Some of you are kinda just repeating past statements... Also, I am not wearing anything right now, except a belt...

Pimpin · February 20, 2008, 07:50:08 PM

Quote from: +Singapura+ on February 20, 2008, 07:37:53 PM

Um... Why don't the people that want to build it, do what they want... The ones who don't, don't... And everyone ignores all furthur posts by ching chong until they're done... � Some of you are kinda just repeating past statements... Also, I am not wearing anything right now, except a belt...

And the award for the gayest random statement that has ever been posted on an internet forum goes to...

Wedge · February 20, 2008, 07:51:04 PM

~~entrepreneur in~~ ~~ProBuilder~~ Singapura!

You were right, you just didn't bold the right bit. :D

+Singapura+ · February 20, 2008, 08:10:44 PM

Damn, was I even one of the nominees? If not, I would like to speak with the academy... There were so many invisible lemon juicers I wanted to thank... And my great-grandsneaker... Waffly Tortuga

ProBuilder · February 21, 2008, 03:43:31 PM

Quote from: entrepreneur in on February 20, 2008, 06:34:01 PM

Why in the HELL would we want to waste our time duplicating an RTB build to prove a point? It IS possible to build that in retail, yes (and if you doubt that you're a moron), but the time and effort it would take would be immense, and the outcome isn't worth it. Aside from that, the build isn't anything special anyway, the only thing it has going for it is its size, but what the build boils down to is just stretchy stretchy lattices.

You could use another method that is visually appealing for the attices.

The differences between Retail and RTB are clear, and to compare them would be idiotic; the games are totally different from one another. Go play RTB if you want to build realistically, play Retail if you want to build with LEGOs.

It's a challenge, you don't have to do it.

Oh and I read like 1/4th of the thread so if it wasn't already an RTB vs. Retail war I guess I just started one :/.

NINJAEDIT: ProBuilder you're a friend.

Your statement is false, no evidence to back it up.

SLOWEREDIT: What the hell, his build doesn't even look like the real thing. Hey buddy, why don't you focus on actually building yours ACCURATELY before you start flaunting the build like you're Jesus Christ.

I use the orginal photos to see where the stuff is located, I build it with modifications so that it is usefull in C and R and to improve the composition to however I wish.

EVENSLOOOOWEREDIT: Hey Wedge you seem to enjoy researching. Remind me to come to you if I need homework help :D.

I'm not going to keep responding to this bullice cream. I will only respond to questions that are logical. I will also give some advice upon request.

Colten · February 21, 2008, 03:45:32 PM

Quote from: ProBuilder on February 21, 2008, 03:43:31 PM

Quote from: entrepreneur in on February 20, 2008, 06:34:01 PM
Why in the HELL would we want to waste our time duplicating an RTB build to prove a point? It IS possible to build that in retail, yes (and if you doubt that you're a moron), but the time and effort it would take would be immense, and the outcome isn't worth it. Aside from that, the build isn't anything special anyway, the only thing it has going for it is its size, but what the build boils down to is just stretchy stretchy lattices.

You could use another method that is visually appealing for the attices.

The differences between Retail and RTB are clear, and to compare them would be idiotic; the games are totally different from one another. Go play RTB if you want to build realistically, play Retail if you want to build with LEGOs.

It's a challenge, you don't have to do it.

Oh and I read like 1/4th of the thread so if it wasn't already an RTB vs. Retail war I guess I just started one :/.

NINJAEDIT: ProBuilder you're a friend.

Your statement is false, no evidence to back it up.

SLOWEREDIT: What the hell, his build doesn't even look like the real thing. Hey buddy, why don't you focus on actually building yours ACCURATELY before you start flaunting the build like you're Jesus Christ.

I use the orginal photos to see where the stuff is located, I build it with modifications so that it is usefull in C and R and to improve the composition to however I wish.

EVENSLOOOOWEREDIT: Hey Wedge you seem to enjoy researching. Remind me to come to you if I need homework help :D.

I'm not going to keep responding to this bullice cream. I will only respond to questions that are logical. I will also give some advice upon request.

Go cry in a corner

Monty · February 21, 2008, 03:52:47 PM

Quote from: ProBuilder on February 21, 2008, 03:43:31 PM

I'm not going to keep responding to this bullice cream. I will only respond to questions that are logical. I will also give some advice upon request.

Respond to this bullice cream or don't respond at all and go cry over your beloved RTB and how it's ugly staticshape bricks can do an 'assload' more than the FxDTSbrick's can, when they are actually outrageously inefficient and visually depressing.

Wedge · February 21, 2008, 04:12:23 PM

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/2584/radiotelescopewnvg9.png

Here is the source file for the image above: http://www.mediafire.com/?6dgy2x3xtxb

And a fun icon.

I plan on mapping this all to an interior, along with a few measurements and reference photos. When we go to take the final pictures, we'd delete it of course.