Author Topic: Annoying Orange: 'Nobody really knows' if climate change is real  (Read 6730 times)



Step 1. Sink California
Step 2. Plant some trees

actually Annoying Orange "doesn't care" about that anymore
The video doesn't make sense with the title.

because he said that specific line, while people were chanting 'lock her up in the background', that meant he was talking about that.

This is the reason Why I follow the moderate mentality with global warming, it might have truth to it, but it's so overblown because 'the chart is very similar to this chart, therefore ITS A CONNECTION!'

That's not how that works, if this causes this, then there should be more evidence than an Arbitrary chart.

It's even just mathematic reasoning that can prove this.

Just like how a Fast Inverse Square Root may be similar to an Inverse Square Root, that doesn't mean because they are similar, they have a connection, they get to similar numerical answers, but how they got there is so far off in different directions it is loving insane.

The video doesn't make sense with the title.

because he said that specific line, while people were chanting 'lock her up in the background', that meant he was talking about that.

This is the reason Why I follow the moderate mentality with global warming, it might have truth to it, but it's so overblown because 'the chart is very similar to this chart, therefore ITS A CONNECTION!'

That's not how that works, if this causes this, then there should be more evidence than an Arbitrary chart.

It's even just mathematic reasoning that can prove this.

Just like how a Fast Inverse Square Root may be similar to an Inverse Square Root, that doesn't mean because they are similar, they have a connection, they get to similar numerical answers, but how they got there is so far off in different directions it is loving insane.
that's definitely not the extent of the scientific research that's gone into this subject. nasa's done a decent job of compiling a bunch of the evidence and information in a fairly easy-to-understand manner http://climate.nasa.gov/

or just listen to cappytaino who, iirc, is actually pretty legitimately qualified to talk about this?
« Last Edit: December 13, 2016, 06:59:02 PM by otto-san »

that's definitely not the extent of the scientific research that's gone into this subject. nasa's done a decent job of compiling a bunch of the evidence and information in a fairly easy-to-understand manner http://climate.nasa.gov/

or just listen to cappytaino who, iirc, is actually pretty legitimately qualified to talk about this?

Yep. Currently majoring in Environmental Earth Sciences with a concentration in Energy (sustainable or otherwise)

looking forward to that ocean acidification boys

>Global warming
>No more west coast

Somehow a bad thing?

>Global warming
>No more west coast

Somehow a bad thing?

only if you eat anything other than a staple crop

only if you eat anything other than a staple crop

If that means no more west coast then I'm fine

If that means no more west coast then I'm fine
how dare you. west coast is the best coast. fight me nerd.

how dare you. west coast is the best coast. fight me nerd.

West coast will be the west toast if you let me take care of it

>Global warming
>No more west coast

Somehow a bad thing?
you're right, don't you live on the west coast
forget it, go global warming
drown the californians

drown the californians
I mean this would solve their drought issues...

that's definitely not the extent of the scientific research that's gone into this subject. nasa's done a decent job of compiling a bunch of the evidence and information in a fairly easy-to-understand manner http://climate.nasa.gov/

or just listen to cappytaino who, iirc, is actually pretty legitimately qualified to talk about this?
you seem to forget that master matthew is a professional amateur researcher of every single topic