stocking - vore spam, disturbed as forget

[IkeTheGeneric]

Just because there are worse things in the world doesn't make this issue suddenly worth zero consideration.

Considering that thread began as the worst of the worst from deviantart, I'd say the vore juxtaposition isn't as bad as people are making it out to be. The two biggest factors is that it's in a thread you only click on if you wanna see depraved garbage in the first place, and that it's easy enough to adblock the images if you so choose to venture beyond the veil of sanity.

[Ad Bot]

[Trogtor]

hey man theres vore in the bible so you know its okay

[Mega-Bear]

hey man theres vore in the bible so you know its okay

There's also a flood but u still a thirsty hoe

[Insert Name Here²]

Considering that thread began as the worst of the worst from deviantart, I'd say the vore juxtaposition isn't as bad as people are making it out to be. The two biggest factors is that it's in a thread you only click on if you wanna see depraved garbage in the first place, and that it's easy enough to adblock the images if you so choose to venture beyond the veil of sanity.

Just because it's posted in a garbage thread doesn't make it suddenly okay and correct to spam it for 20+ pages. Plus now she's posting it outside of the thread too, so the excuse of "w-well its in a thread for it!!!" doesn't really apply any more.

[Nix the Glaceon]

actually, to assert that stomach acid is simply hydrochloric acid is a gross simplification of a beautiful and complex process

it's actually a mixture of intentionally dilluted hydrochloric acid as well pepsin, lipase, gastrin and mucin. all of these things work together to break down complex proteins and carbohydrates that would otherwise be indigestible (or completely inert) to pepsin alone. this is why the human digestive system is actually capable of digesting bone when acid alone would merely bleach it.

-cataracts-

when u can't make a comeback so u just damage control ur way out of it

[Daswiruch]

spam it for 20+ pages.

i don't think you know what spam means

[Insert Name Here²]

i don't think you know what spam means

posting it over and over continuously only to troll seems quite like spamming, if it isn't idfk what is

[TheABELBOTO]

>when someone spams your research source with vore and you've had it

[Marios]

So stocking's vore is okay because you can block it? What about the 10-year-old browsing the forum? You can bet he can't block anything. If he clicks on it expecting something safe for kids his age and he gets something for 15/16 and above is it his fault?

This isn't the You Cringe You Lose thread, and so if I want things that are not research, vore or just disgusting in this thread it can't be too unreasonable.

Now you'll say "Well the Blockland forums aren't known for being innocent". That's true - but it's only known to those who have been accustomed to the community. What about that guy who will read the name of the game, saying "Blockland", and then expect content "rated E for everyone", so to say, and thus no NSFW? Is it his fault?

[beachbum111111]

So stocking's vore is okay because you can block it? What about the 10-year-old browsing the forum? You can bet he can't block anything. If he clicks on it expecting something safe for kids his age and he gets something for 15/16 and above is it his fault?

You do realize that you are suppose to be 13 years of age or older to have an account on this forum right?

Don't get me wrong I'm in favour of removing all the cannibalism vore stuff but in that case there should be consistency and the special interest thread, hot anime girls threads, furry thread, and all that other cigarettegy stuff should be removed as well.

[IkeTheGeneric]

Just because it's posted in a garbage thread doesn't make it suddenly okay and correct to spam it for 20+ pages.

Kinda actually does make it okay. It's the bad deviantart thread. You don't get to pick and choose what's acceptable badness, it's ALL bad.

[startacker]

You do realize that you are suppose to be 13 years of age or older to have an account on this forum right?

Nah, that was removed quite a bit ago, and I really do mean quite a bit.

[Bisjac]

Her pics don't have nudists or gore. Basically the only things actually banned around here.
Not sure why you guys are trying to hard to invent new rules.

[Marios]

Her pics don't have nudists or gore. Basically the only things actually banned around here.
Not sure why you guys are trying to hard to invent new rules.

Then let's release our barrage of disgusting pics. It's not research or gore, so it's okay, right?

[Stocking]

So stocking's vore is okay because you can block it? What about the 10-year-old browsing the forum? You can bet he can't block anything. If he clicks on it expecting something safe for kids his age and he gets something for 15/16 and above is it his fault?

The problem is is that vore isn't objectively loveual. There is absolutely nothing inherently loveual about eating and digesting a person. Therefor it is not loveual content.