yes but you have a brain and eyes and can read and understand the intentions of my post instead of nitpick on one part.
Making guns legal but certain areas illegal is near pointless because anyone can acquire a firearm and bring it into the illegal zone. It makes the law completely obsolete.
If you make the source illegal then people wont be able to acquire the guns anyways and will completely eliminate the need for a no gun zone in the first place
And you missed the point of my rebuttal.
Of course gun-free zones are loving stupid and we can agree on that. Banning certain types of guns, however, is also pointless because it's
ridiculously easy to get them illegally, as opposed to legally, which requires a pretty in-depth background check and a special license.
Case in point, the San Bernardino shooting was committed in full by use of an automatic, large-magazine assault rifle, despite such guns being banned throughout California.