Poll

Do you?

Yes
135 (75.8%)
No
43 (24.2%)

Total Members Voted: 176

Author Topic: Do you think Lolicon should be considered child enthusiasm?  (Read 70273 times)

Most anime girls look no older than 16.



if you also play annie i am going to pick karthus mid every game until i find you and go ghost on your ass
« Last Edit: January 23, 2017, 09:21:26 PM by kongo »

you can just loving google anime girl and get your answer, it would've took less effort than replying to me
why do you want to assert your point so bad when are unable to provide evidence to support your claim
this. "lol just google it!!!" isn't a real rebuttal. maybe you could have used facts instead of making stuff up and dismissing anybody who calls you out on it. takes more effort, but it doesn't make you look like a complete moron

besides, how do you even judge how old an anime character looks like? is there some sort of pattern that only you've realized? either way it doesn't matter because the canonical age of the character is what matters, not the looks.

it's not degenerate. is thought crime a thing in your universe?

No it's a Thot Crime So then Furcigarettes aren't degenerate because if they were it would be a thoughtcrime
yes because that's actually degenerate and pollutes the limited white gene pool. if current trends continue, the world will be less than 10% white in 40 years...

Would you ban furfriendry and cuckholdry?

No it's a Thot Crime So then Furcigarettes aren't degenerate because if they were it would be a thoughtcrime

the difference is is that furcigarettes dress up in animal suits and have love with real animals

almost every "furcigarette" on the internet with a pet has loveually abused it

Would you ban furfriendry and cuckholdry?

yes. the first for being a mental illness and the second for being traitorous to their race.

One comment in and you're already playing the handicap card? Come on.

i honestly dont know who the hell you are. whose alt are you

i think it's pretty much just child enthusiasm in a very poor disguise but i don't think fictional loli content should be banned, i like to believe that it keeps creeps in check so i say keep it, so that they'll just jerk off to that instead of going to the playground and snatching a little one

this. "lol just google it!!!" isn't a real rebuttal. maybe you could have used facts instead of making stuff up and dismissing anybody who calls you out on it. takes more effort, but it doesn't make you look like a complete moron

besides, how do you even judge how old an anime character looks like? is there some sort of pattern that only you've realized? either way it doesn't matter because the canonical age of the character is what matters, not the looks.
First of all it's not being dismissive it's called using your eyes.
Second can you seriously not tell how old people look? stuff bait.

an anime girl that looks like they're ten is ten, regardless of "actual" age
too bad the same doesnt apply to transgenders but with their "actual" gender aM I RIGHT
yes its not ok
its WEIRDER if the loli are flatchested because that implies the artist is trying harder to make them seem child-like
but both flat or not flat are weird regardless

Second can you seriously not tell how old people look? stuff bait.
in anime characters can look six but turn out to be thousand year old demons

this. "lol just google it!!!" isn't a real rebuttal. maybe you could have used facts instead of making stuff up and dismissing anybody who calls you out on it. takes more effort, but it doesn't make you look like a complete moron

besides, how do you even judge how old an anime character looks like? is there some sort of pattern that only you've realized? either way it doesn't matter because the canonical age of the character is what matters, not the looks.
every single human being has the ability to roughly estimate how old someone is based on how they look. don't play stupid. making a character that looks 12 with a squeaky voice and saying "its ok shes an 1000 year old witch" doesnt mean anything, its still loli because they purposely drew the character to look underaged.

honestly making lolicon into child enthusiasm isnt going to make much of a difference

artists are just gonna start saying their chars are 23 or 30 year olds or some stuff while looking like an 8 year old like they've already started to do to get by laws/rules in their country/website they're based in

people like that exist in real life anyways
« Last Edit: January 23, 2017, 09:35:24 PM by Decepticon »

the difference is is that furcigarettes dress up in animal suits and have love with real animals

almost every "furcigarette" on the internet with a pet has loveually abused it

Wait do you have proof of that? I mean Frequency can tell you right now that an alarming amount of white women have forgeted dogs.
http://www.strawpoll.me/12183908/r

yes. the first for being a mental illness and the second for being traitorous to their race.

Can't argue with that.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2017, 09:46:01 PM by beachbum111111 »

stuffs hella weird though

in anime characters can look six but turn out to be thousand year old demons
"its not loli shes actually thousands and thousands of years old!!!!!"

does that also count as necrophilia or granny research then

every single human being has the ability to roughly estimate how old someone is based on how they look. don't play stupid. making a character that looks 12 with a squeaky voice and saying "its ok shes an 1000 year old witch" doesnt mean anything, its still loli because they purposely drew the character to look underaged.
this sums up the argument nicely

"its not loli shes actually thousands and thousands of years old!!!!!"
i didn't say it wasn't loli i just said that though she looked six, she was actually one-thousand

First of all it's not being dismissive it's called using your eyes.
Second can you seriously not tell how old people look? stuff bait.
every single human being has the ability to roughly estimate how old someone is based on how they look. don't play stupid. making a character that looks 12 with a squeaky voice and saying "its ok shes an 1000 year old witch" doesnt mean anything, its still loli because they purposely drew the character to look underaged.
all i'm saying is that using your eyes is pretty subjective, not everybody sees things the same way you do. obviously the 9-year-old-that's-actually-a-millennia-old-witch thing has some degree of creepiness to it, but am i a creep if i want to forget shorter 18 year olds?