Poll

Do you?

Yes
135 (75.8%)
No
43 (24.2%)

Total Members Voted: 176

Author Topic: Do you think Lolicon should be considered child enthusiasm?  (Read 70664 times)

if you did not fantasize about kim possible you are lying

if it looks like a child, then it's CP
kim possible could be barely legal just by looks

regardless of the content I don't think art of any form should be banned, photographs being the obvious exception.
Agreed, but it's important to recognize the inspirations behind the art that defines it, for Bob Ross it's the natural vistas of the world and woods, for Loli it's the obsession over the body of a prepubescent child.

Loli shouldn't be banned, but it's still not something that should be accepted.


Loli wasn't derived from child enthusiasm
say what you will, but it doesn't change history



Definition of "prepubescent" for those who continue to deny it



Preceding puberty, aka before it.

Kim Possible is apparently 14 even though she's bangin' hot.



i don't know. in terms of japanese anime, i can't honestly tell how old someone is. it's really vague.


btw does rule 34 count as loli?



whether or not r34 counts as loli depends on whether the character depicted is an underage girl or not
it really doesn't have anything to do with the fact that it's r34

yeah i should've been more specific there.

iirc, there's a chart of loli legality status in the us that goes around on 4chan all the time. can't find it right now.


btw does rule 34 count as loli?
yes when the material is loli and simmilar

Loli originates from a desire to have love with little girls. It is technically child enthusiasm. End of thread.

Loli originates from a desire to have love with little girls. It is technically child enthusiasm. End of thread.

lol