Do you think Lolicon should be considered child enthusiasm?

[Nonnel]

how do you justify boinking it to drawings of children

[Ad Bot]

[beachbum111111]

Nice contribution to a discussion

You made a stuffty comparison

how do you justify boinking it to drawings of children

Because it doesn't violate the NAP

[Otis Da HousKat]

Like you all haven't jacked it to little girls before.

[espio100]

how do you justify boinking it to drawings of children

Because no kids where harmed in the making? Its completely innocent.
Unlike real child research and child enthusiasm

If you dont like lolicon thats just your opinion but if youre genuinly misinformed and spread misinformation you should stop with everything youre doing and rethink it all

[rambo1220]

Yeah you are an ignorant twat for still not realising its a work of fiction

alright well on that note I'm going to go draw an image of young prepubescent girls/boys in an obvious loveual manner, and despite the creepphillic roots of said artwork, it's alright, it has no connection to any feelings or loveual desires I may have towards young children because it's a work of fiction.

Because no kids where harmed in the making? Its completely innocent.
Unlike real child research and child enthusiasm

you realize people have been arrested over depicting young children in loveual situations right.

If you dont like lolicon thats just uour opiniom but if youre genuinly misinformed and spread misinformation you should stop with everything youre doing and rethink it all

since when is citing Wikipedia and the law where lolicon is legally classified as an expressive medium of creepphilic tendencies misinformation.

I think you just don't like the truth boyo

[Nonnel]

Because no kids where harmed in the making? Its completely innocent.
Unlike real child research and child enthusiasm

real child enthusiasm as opposed to

[espio100]

alright well on that note I'm going to go draw an image of young prepubescent girls/boys in an obvious loveual manner, and despite the creepphillic roots of said artwork, it's alright, it has no connection to any feelings or loveual desires I may have towards young children because it's a work of fiction.

I never said every lolicon doesnt like real children, that depends on the certain individual. That still doesnt mean that loli's are real kids
But yeah, its all right

you realize people have been arrested over depicting young children in loveual situations right.

That depends on the country or state. Its their laws and we dont really have anything to say about that

since when is citing Wikipedia and the law where lolicon is legally classified as an expressive medium of creepphilic tendencies misinformation.

Because wikipedia articles are a full 100% accurate. Well neither is urbandictionary.
Also:

>anime or manga
>works of fiction and literally illustrations
Wew lad

[ReddBoi]

Like you all haven't jacked it to little girls before.

what

[beachbum111111]

Stocking rn

[Planr]

Stocking rn
<snip>

woah i didn't know Annoying Orange's wall looked like that

also for real if you can't differentiate between liking loli and wanting to literally molest children, you have more problems than loli fans do

[Nonnel]

I just don't see how you can get an erection to a drawing of a child and think it's not child enthusiasm

[beachbum111111]

also for real if you can't differentiate between liking loli and wanting to literally molest children, you have more problems than loli fans do

Found the creep. Touching kids is against the bible you know.

[SeventhSandwich]

also for real if you can't differentiate between liking loli and wanting to literally molest children, you have more problems than loli fans do

child enthusiasts are defined by their attraction to pre-pubescents, not their likelihood to molest them. If you are loveually attracted to a cartoon proxy for a 7-year-old girl, you are a child enthusiast.

[Stocking]

Stocking rn
[im g]https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16300476_1785027781819514_3564722366960972898_o.jpg?oh=eaaeb56e7b3fcffa908ed3a05f13938f&oe=5910292E[/img]

14 isnt even loli wtf

14yo anime girl



based loli

[MoltenKitten]

Yoko is not 14. I don't give a forget what the creator said, she looks at least 16 and they never say here age in the show.