Author Topic: [news] THE WALL IS GOING UP  (Read 28194 times)

no one expects it to stop 100% of people. but hoards wont be walking on through anymore.
Hoards don't walk through already lol. The majority of illegal immigrants enter our country through overstaying visas or being smuggled in by coyotes.

Might make it a bit harder for the coyotes to do their job, but they'll manage. Expect a drop until the first tunnel is built.



If we really want to solve this problem of illegal immigration permanently, there's basically two options. We can either cease the subsidization of our agriculture and compete fairly in the market, or we can offer citizenship to undocumented immigrants. The first option will likely never happen because politics is dominated by special interest groups, so amnesty seems to be the most realistic option.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2017, 05:36:04 AM by SeventhSandwich »

of course, Annoying Orange and his supporters won't do that because they don't actually want to stop undocumented immigrants, they want to stop people with darker skin from entering the country

or maybe it's to keep morons like you who think that everyone who disagrees with them is fascist out of power, considering you would benefit from having a bigger base of Latinos "immigrating" from big-government, practically authoritarian countries

escaping from authoritarian country = supporting authoritarianism?

wouldn't getting rid of nafta just make things more expensive for everyone? like i get the whole protectionist thing but how is getting rid of nafta a good idea? is it supposed to be good for business? i don't think so, businesses benefit from the cheap markets in mexico. is it supposed to be good for consumers? i don't think that's the case either, because trade barriers just make things more expensive for them too

who benefits from destroying nafta other than people who just want to punish mexico for like...being a stuff country
« Last Edit: January 27, 2017, 01:37:55 PM by otto-san »

escaping from authoritarian country = supporting authoritarianism?

Not to that extreme of a position but people coming from stuffty places tend to vote Dem

escaping from authoritarian country = supporting authoritarianism?

you'd be surprised

Not to that extreme of a position but people coming from stuffty places tend to vote Dem
the more socially progressive party...?

the more socially progressive party...?
No. They're not and you know they're not.

the more socially progressive party...?

If that's code for giving people free stuff then sure they're the socially progressive party

Don't worry guys, my parents told me democrats are stupid and selfish, too!!


when i doubt, try and humiliate your opponent by saying they only parrot what their parents say

when i doubt, try and humiliate your opponent by saying they only parrot what their parents say

"Democrats only want free stuff and they're not actually as progressive as they say" is practically what everyone parroting their parents says

Don't worry guys, my parents told me democrats are stupid and selfish, too!!
Thats neat, but the democrats showed me they care more about frivelous identity politics and regressive policies then the people who vote for them

Thats neat, but the democrats showed me they care more about frivelous identity politics and regressive policies then the people who vote for them

Both parties got caught up in half-baked, nonissue social policies during the primaries and general election. Your us vs. them mentality only shows how childish your viewpoint is.