[NEWS] Brexit: MPs overwhelmingly back Article 50 bill

[Insert Name Here²]

"I understand that lol" as in I understand what Ipquarx is getting at. I still stand by my point that my original post was just a joke, not an argument or legitimate point like both of you are trying to push.

This argument is extremely petty and I'm going to do the smart thing and end it here due to it going literally nowhere.

[Ad Bot]

[TristanLuigi]

pages discussing INH: 2
pages discussing the electoral college: 1
pages discussing brexit: 0
posts whining about the above statistics: 1

[DestroyerOfBlocks]

"I understand that lol" as in I understand what Ipquarx is getting at. I still stand by my point that my original post was just a joke, not an argument or legitimate point like both of you are trying to push.

This argument is extremely petty and I'm going to do the smart thing and end it here due to it going literally nowhere.

you are mistakenly assuming that only your intent matters when conveying meaning. language is a finicky thing and the meaning of words is decided by a sort of unspoken consent of the majority, if the majority or even a large minority of people who use "liberal tears" believe it to be a legitimate caricature or genuine trolling then you can quite easily be mistaken as serious despite any intention. ipquarx is pointing out that the required sizable population exists

pages discussing INH: 2
pages discussing the electoral college: 1
pages discussing brexit: 0
posts whining about the above statistics: 1

the brits can have their rainy hellhole to themselves

[Insert Name Here²]

not an argument or legitimate point like both of you are trying to push.

Your repeated implications says otherwise

it matches his previous political postings and there is no traces of joke

its the same sort of self assuring dumb stuff of "u mad" where if anyone responds they are automatically "mad" except replace mad with crying and liberal and some people actually believe it

it is entirely believable that you are laughing at a social justice caricature you think represents all liberals, disparaging many legitimate opinions with a throwaway comment while simultaneously demonstrating no knowledge of the subject.

[The Resonte!]

as in

he "wouldn't put it past you" to post something like that in a serious fashion

it wasn't but it was thought of that

poes law is such a joy

This argument is extremely petty and I'm going to do the smart thing and end it here due to it going literally nowhere.

laugh

[DestroyerOfBlocks]

quote 1 demonstrates how past actions and ambiguity can lead to misinterpretation

quote 2 is explaining why people get angry over liberal tears

quote 3 demonstrates how past actions and ambiguity can lead to misinterpretation

nowhere did i claim you saying liberal tears was pushing a legitimate point or an argument, there is not enough substance in the phrase to warrant anything substantive in response

[TristanLuigi]

oh for forgets fake he made a stuffty ill-advised joke but now we know his actual intentions and everything is fine

is there really anything left unsaid

[DestroyerOfBlocks]

 not really considering the last post between us was over an hour ago

[Nal]

how to avoid this next time

use /s

[beachbum111111]

how to avoid this next time

use /s

Or don't get assblasted over an obvious joke

[Poliwhirl]

this is what those limey bastards get for taxing our tea

[DestroyerOfBlocks]

Or don't get assblasted or an obvious joke

[Nal]

Or don't get assblasted over an obvious joke

maybe you should have something worthwhile to say next time 

[beachbum111111]

maybe you should have something worthwhile to say next time 

The only posts you have made in this thread have been you bitching that other people weren't saying something relevant to the thread.

[Poliwhirl]

The only posts you have made in this thread have been you bitching that other people weren't saying something relevant to the thread.

still better than your posts