Author Topic: [NEWS] Violent UC Berkeley riots force cancellation of Milo Yiannopoulos event  (Read 58980 times)

This isnt about learning lessons, this about national security.
We cant sift out potential terrorists from people who entered the country illegally. This is an evermore prevalent issue as radicalization usually happens in poorer communities.
i'm all for finding illegals and i get the terrorism thing despite not 100% agreeing with it, but the punishment just seems wrong to me
News is saying $100k in damages from the protest.
jesus forget

Thanks young blood. You'll enter the work force someday.

Young blood? Lmao you sound like a Harry Potter character with that stuff.


Young blood? Lmao you sound like a Harry Potter character with that stuff.

We doing this again?

No it's something I say because someone I knew said it around me much the same way Gatsby called people "Old Sport."

No need to act pretentious.

i'm all for finding illegals and i get the terrorism thing despite not 100% agreeing with it, but the punishment just seems wrong to me jesus forget
Now, im not so sure they should be permantly barred from ever entering tbe country again, but we need to do this, because those most persistent on entering the country illegally are most likely driven by some core belief that pushes all otherwise meaningful reason to the wayside, revealing potential threats.


Young blood? Lmao you sound like a Harry Potter character with that stuff.

young bloods these days. no respect

because those most persistent on entering the country illegally are most likely driven by some core belief that pushes all otherwise meaningful reason to the wayside, revealing potential threats.
Since when is seeking a future without severed heads hanging from the freeways and a decent education for your children an evil ulterior motive?

You make it sound like people who come to america illegally are doing it because they hate america

I don't think illegals should be barred from immigrating legally at a later time unless they committed a crime while here.

Edit: I should clarify. As long as they don't commit a crime alongside the crime of being here illegally.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 12:18:50 AM by Corderlain »

if they're escaping some horrible situation like severe poverty or war or something, i'd say it's justified that they escape to america. obviously it's illegal, but if there was a path for well meaning illegal immigrants to gain residence or citizenship that'd be v good

Badspot

  • Administrator
How do you feel about that time when Buzz Aldrin punched Bart Sibrel after being repeatedly harassed by him?

It's not even a remotely comparable situation.  It was a one on one confrontation with the guy directly harassing Buzz.  Buzz squared off and gave warning. 

Richard Spencer was giving an interview and giving completely reasonable answers to multiple people who were stuffty to him, then a random masked criminal sucker punches him.  Richard Spencer is the Buzz Aldrin of this situation.  Have you not watched the video?  Do you see that sign in the background?  Richard Spencer might have some bad ideas, but that doesn't make his opponents good.



Milo had planned to live-stream the outing of undocumented students and show others how to do it too. IMO, I'm glad that was prevented.

Considering every single "fact" like this you've posted has been wrong, I'm guessing you're either wrong or misrepresenting this too.  I like how you just ignored me every time I debunked your bullstuff by the way.



equality and social progress

I don't think the left knows what these words mean.  They're openly arguing for racially segregated dorms.  For giving positions not based on ability but on skin color. For the dissolution of the police force.  For the assassination of the democratically elected president.  Sally Boynton Brown, running for DNC chair, campaigned that her job was to shut white people up - she got applause. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwzffeICkP8

First couple seconds you see a girl just beat into submission by a flag pole.

I don't think the left knows what these words mean.  They're openly arguing for racially segregated dorms.  For giving positions not based on ability but on skin color. For the dissolution of the police force.  For the assassination of the democratically elected president.  Sally Boynton Brown, running for DNC chair, campaigned that her job was to shut white people up - she got applause.  
I think your opinions on liberals are founded more on alt-right outrage videos than on reality. Yes, there are people who believe those things, but it's literally just as easy to pull up anecdotes about crazy things that conservatives/libertarians/greens/etc believe. The vast majority of liberals don't actually believe those things, and the people who do are confined to the ultra-liberal SJW circles that normal people can't stand.

There are dozens of millions of liberals in this country, and it's statistically impossible that there aren't radicals in a group that large. If you're looking to confirm your biases against them, you will always be able to find anecdotes that support your beliefs.

Also, I looked into the stats on affirmative action, and a Gallup poll shows that 32% of white conservatives and 50% of white moderates support it. I don't think the evidence suggests that support for affirmative action is a part of the liberal caricature. If we want to treat it as a problem in society, it's a bipartisan issue.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/18091/race-ideology-support-affirmative-action.aspx

Sally Boynton Brown, running for DNC chair, campaigned that her job was to shut white people up - she got applause.  
That's an unfortunate way to phrase it, but notice that both Brown and the crowd are white. That's the difference between racism against a group in power, and racism against a group that's not. When white people say something tribal against other white people, it's in bad taste. When white people say something tribal against minorities, we elect them president and set bills in motion to appropriate $25b for a wall.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 03:51:49 AM by SeventhSandwich »

People immigrate here legally every year in droves. Wait in line like them or risk being sent away. Seems simple to me.
But we have millions of people living here, already integrated into the workforce, who we could be collecting taxes from, who we could prevent from sending remittances to Mexico by giving them permanent citizenship. Is it really worth the economic damages and headache to deport them? Just to be 'fair' to an immigration system that's already needless complex, confusing, and unfair?

Plus like, when we deport undocumented immigrants, it's not like we offer someone their spot off of the waitlist. The caps for immigration are the same, regardless of how many people we deport. So it's not like we're letting Mexicans cut in line.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 04:10:55 AM by SeventhSandwich »

Considering every single "fact" like this you've posted has been wrong, I'm guessing you're either wrong or misrepresenting this too.  I like how you just ignored me every time I debunked your bullstuff by the way.

From inside the room where the speech was, before you get too roostery.



Even Breitbart sponsors that claim, saying the main focus of the presentation was "sanctuary campuses": http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/01/31/milo-horowitz-start-campaign-sanctuary-campuses/amp/

Multiple students were aware of this aspect of the presentation beforehand: http://www.sfgate.com/news/amp/UC-warns-campus-group-Yiannopoulos-event-could-10901517.php

I meant that violent protest is not a form of terrorist activity, it's a crime.

Quote from: Dictionary.com
Terrorism: the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

idk man seems like terrorism to me