Holy stuff CNN is going full handicap.

[Master Matthew²]

So he'd make a much better mouthpiece then loving Milo

No, Gavin is a fool. Sorry, but he may have had some sense going against Hillary the way he did, but that doesn't make him infallible.

[Ad Bot]

[Planr]

Nothing in that statement is false. They probably should have used 'riots' instead of 'protests', but both options are true.

This has to be by far the dumbest thing I've ever seen you post on this forum. Milo is neither a white supremacist or an extremist. He's denounced this kind of bullstuff slander a thousand times. The dude literally likes having gay love with black guys. And I challenge you to back up defending CNN's statement of him as an extremist as true.

[beachbum111111]

No, Gavin is a fool. Sorry, but he may have had some sense going against Hillary the way he did, but that doesn't make him infallible.

>Implying Milo is any better

[SeventhSandwich]

Dude you're an idiot. Milo is neither a white supremacist or an extremist.

The headline doesn't actually accuse him of being a white supremacist, but he's definitely an extremist in the sense that his views are extremely right-wing. He writes for Breitbart and travels the country stuffting all over everything outside the alt-right narrative. I would wager that the vast majority of conservatives disagree with what he says, meaning that he's part of a small radical subset of conservative thought. I.e., an extremist.

[Planr]

Exactly which of his views are extremist? Virtually all his positions line up with everything Annoying Orange and many other Republicans such as myself believe (and the vast majority of Republicans voted for Annoying Orange in the election). Or do you simply just believe that people with right wing views are extremists.

Also for future reference he is not affiliated with the alt-right movement. He has denounced it a thousand times and has stated clearly he is not involved in it.

[SeventhSandwich]

Exactly which of his views are extremist?

He flatly rejects any philosophy that labels itself as a progressive social movement and believes that white conservatives are the most marginalized group in the United States. His entire status as a journalist is defined by raising outrage over any perceived attack on his fringe alt-right ideology.

But he's not an extremist just because all of that's stupid; it's because his beliefs are so aggressive and deluded that they're unpalatable to the majority of people on his side of the political spectrum. BLF users aren't necessarily a representative sample of conservatives, but I assure you it's not a coincidence that right-wing blocklanders dislike him as much as I do. He's an extremist because his position lies on the outskirts of right-wing thought.

Also for future reference he is not affiliated with the alt-right movement. He has denounced it a thousand times and has stated clearly he is not involved in it.

something something a spade-is-a-spade-even-if-the-label-is-unattractive

[Planr]

So which of his beliefs do you think are aggressive and deluded?

[SeventhSandwich]

So which of his beliefs do you think are aggressive and deluded?

probably the ones I wrote in the first two sentences

[Planr]

probably the ones I wrote in the first two sentences

The third one is not even true, the second one is correct, and the first one is correct as well (and for good reason, because virtually all progressive social justice movements today are bullstuff). There is nothing wrong with the first two. Try again.

[SeventhSandwich]

The third one is not even true, the second one is correct, and the first one is correct as well.

There's absolutely no way you can be an objective judge of this, since you agree with his politics to begin with.

[Corderlain]

So someone who agreed with a person can never have an objective opinion on anything remotely related to them?

[Deus Ex]

white conservatives are the most marginalized group in the United States.

This is true though, if you're a white conservative you're pretty much considered a national socialist at this point.

[SeventhSandwich]

So someone who agreed with a person can never have an objective opinion on anything remotely related to them?

Therein lies the problem, because an 'objective opinion' is an oxymoron and does not exist. If we were talking about whether Humble Water Filter Merchant is an extremist, it would mean absolutely nothing if Humble Water Filter Merchant' biggest fan came on and said, "He's not an extremist because his views are true! I should know, I have self-identified myself as a representative picture of American conservatism!"

If conservatives on the forums and in America were coming out in droves to support Milo, then I might reassess calling him an extremist. But the consensus among most moderate conservatives is that he's a cunt.

[LeisureSuit912]

Seriously, are you high?
Explain how a gay man who loves black richard is a 'white supremacist'

Seventh, you're going full libtard.

Milo's a dumb college republican and you should feel bad for being a fan of someone who does nothing but act super-defensive online and complain about the pettiest things

This is true though, if you're a white conservative you're pretty much considered a national socialist at this point.

All those poor, marginalized white conservatives now control the government, so I don't know what you're talking about

[Corderlain]

Therein lies the problem, because an 'objective opinion' is an oxymoron and does not exist.

I don't agree with this opinion.