Author Topic: [NEWS] Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart  (Read 22262 times)

i prefer Annoying Orange 100x more than milo

If milo were to conceivably run for office i would personally lead the riots against him

If milo were to conceivably run for office i would personally lead the riots against him

Badspot was right

Nonviolent riots of course. I know thats kinda dumb like sugar free sugar but id make sure its nonviolent

It'd be an angry but peaceful protest

The word you're looking for is protest

Nonviolent riots of course. I know thats kinda dumb like sugar free sugar but id make sure its nonviolent
almost... conceivably.. kind of like... a protest?? really got my noggin joggin with that one

forget my posts are really losing intelligence lately

brah forget that i'd chokeslam that twink milo into the shadow realm before i let him get anywhere near a public office

forget my posts are really losing intelligence lately
Well, in this case the poor do really get poorer don't they?

brah forget that i'd chokeslam that twink milo into the shadow realm before i let him get anywhere near a public office
That's what you think! but I've still got berserker soul quick spell card.
Sorry Jimbo, but it looks like you're the one going to the shadow realm.

Milo, that's it, I'm done.

You've gone full hypocrite, you virtue signalling cuck.

You could have made this video any other time, but not only did you choose to do it now, you openly admitted that you did it because of the recent controversy.
I'm sorry, but you have lost my respect, and you can take that Victim Card and shove it up your ass.
matthew has his ((((second)))) midlife crCIA


That's what you think! but I've still got berserker soul quick spell card.
Sorry Jimbo, but it looks like you're the one going to the shadow realm.
B L U E   E Y E S   W H I T E   D R A G ON


https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851072498363980
Quote
There's a video going around that purports to show me saying anti-semitic things (nope) and advocating for child enthusiasm (big nope). The shocking thing? It's Republicans doing it. Sad to see establishment types collapse into the same tactics as social justice warriors: name calling, deceptively edited videos, confected moral outrage and public shaming. This is why they deserve to burn -- and why they are burning. Here's how I actually feel about child enthusiasm, which you'd know if you'd actually watched or read anything I've ever done. Or, you know, if you had two brain cells to rub together. There's only one appropriate response to this sort of behavior, and it's a gigantic forget YOU!

https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905
Quote
A note for idiots (UPDATED):
I do not support child enthusiasm. Period. It is a vile and disgusting crime, perhaps the very worst. There are selectively edited videos doing the rounds, as part of a co-ordinated effort to discredit me from establishment Republicans, that suggest I am soft on the subject.
If it somehow comes across (through my own sloppy phrasing or through deceptive editing) that I meant any of the ugly things alleged, let me set the record straight: I am completely disgusted by the abuse of children.
Some facts to consider:
1. I have outed THREE child enthusiasts in my career as a journalist. That's three more than any of my critics and a peculiar strategy for a supposed child enthusiast apologist.
(a) Luke Bozier, former business partner of Louise Mensch
http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/…/menshn-co-founder-embroile…/
http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/…/…/3746/luke-bozier-arrested/
(b) Nicholas Nyberg, anti-GamerGate activist who self-described as a child enthusiast and white nationalist
http://www.breitbart.com/…/leading-gamergate-critic-sarah-…/
(c) Chris Leydon, a London photographer who has a rape trial starting March 13 thanks to my reporting.
http://www.breitbart.com/…/tech-city-darling-chris-leydon-…/
2. I have repeatedly expressed disgust at child enthusiasts in my journalism.
http://www.breitbart.com/…/heres-why-the-progressive-left-…/
3. I have never defended and would never defend child abusers, as my reporting history shows. The world is messy and complicated, and I recognize it as such, as this furore demonstrates. But that is a red line for any decent person.
4. The videos do not show what people say they show. I *did* joke about giving better head as a result of clerical loveual abuse committed against me when I was a teen. If I choose to deal in an edgy way on an internet livestream with a crime I was the victim of that's my prerogative. It's no different to gallows humor from AIDS sufferers.
5. National Review, whose journalists are tweeting about this, published an article defending Salon for giving a child enthusiast a platform.
6. I did say that there are relationships between younger men and older men that can help a young gay man escape from a lack of support or understanding at home. That's perfectly true and every gay man knows it. But I was not talking about anything illegal and I was not referring to pre-pubescent boys.
7. I said in the same "Drunken Peasants" podcast from which the footage is taken that I agree with the current age of consent.
8. I shouldn't have used the word "boy" when I talked about those relationships between older men and younger gay men. (I was talking about my own relationship when I was 17 with a man who was 29. The age of consent in the UK is 16.) That was a mistake. Gay men often use the word "boy" when they refer to consenting adults. I understand that heteroloveual people might not know that, so it was a sloppy choice of words that I regret.
9. This rush to judgment from establishment conservatives who hate Annoying Orange as much as they hate me, before I have had any chance to provide context or a response, is one of the big reasons gays vote Democrat.
10. In case there is any lingering doubt, here's me, in the same interview the other footage is taken from, affirming that the current legal age of consent is about right: "And I think the law is probably about right. It's probably roughly the right age. I think it's probably about ok. But there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age. I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who were loveually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world, by the way."

dunno if they've been posted before but these are milo's responses

B L U E   E Y E S   W H I T E   D R A G ON
B U R S T   S T R E A M


tfw ur alt right idol is a child enthusiast and u dont care