[NEWS] Republican bill will reduce free school lunch

[Insert Name Here²]

it determines the outcome of the other programs, not the lunch program. show where i explicitly said it determines the outcome of the lunch program

when schools and jobs determine financial support and other stuff they always look at race. it's not a race issue, it's just how they come to certain decisions. i wouldn't be surprised if they factor in race into the free lunch eligibility form. it's probably a checkbox like "what is your child's race?"

By the way, the free lunch program is in the financial support and "other stuff" you're talking about. The free lunch program was made to help families financially by not forcing them to pay for lunch every day.

If this wasn't intentional, then you sure did make it sound damn well like it was.

[Ad Bot]

[Corderlain]

it determines the outcome of the other programs, not the lunch program. show where i explicitly said it determines the outcome of the lunch program
show me this imaginary data that isn't associated with NSL
fine, then. tell me: who will benefit from cutting back on school lunch?

I'm not totally convinced you're not trolling at this point. I'm not saying I doubt the data because of counter evidence, I am saying I doubt the data because it has no additional studies to back it up. This is how hypothesis become theories in science: replicability.

Until it's corroborated or disproven I'll just be skeptical.

[Red Spy]

fine, then. tell me: who will benefit from cutting back on school lunch?

Oh damn you got me there!!!

Maybe the one percent that probably sends their kids to private schools?

[PhantOS]

By the way, the free lunch program is in the financial support and "other stuff" you're talking about. The free lunch program was made to help families financially by not forcing them to pay for lunch every day.

free lunch is not legally part of financial support/aid, and other stuff literally means 'other stuff' as in not the financial aid or free lunch

I'm not totally convinced you're not trolling at this point. I'm not saying I doubt the data because of counter evidence, I am saying I doubt the data because it has no additional studies to back it up. This is how hypothesis become theories in science: replicability.

how do you 'additional studies' a program that records its own statistics and publishes them online? when you get a police report on a murder, do you immediately doubt its credibility because there are no other additional studies on that exact case? how could there be any additional evidence- they're the only people who are responsible and can produce the evidence in the first place.

Law and statistics are not science. When someone publishes data, there is not an obligatory 'second data' to prove it.

Oh damn you got me there!!!

Maybe the one percent that probably sends their kids to private schools?

how would people sending their kids to private school benefit from it? is not having to pay an additional cent in taxes considered a benefit?

[Insert Name Here²]

free lunch is not legally part of financial support/aid

Yet, it's still specifically made to fit directly into that category.

[PhantOS]

Yet, it's still specifically made to fit directly into that category.

Free Lunch has literally nothing to do with the Financial Aid program besides the fact that they are both owned by the government. they are two completely separate wings of educational support

unlike Free Lunch, Financial Aid actually does look at your race and does judge you unfairly against people of other races

[Corderlain]

Actually trolling okie doke have a nice night sleep tight I've got work in like four hours.

[PhantOS]

Actually trolling okie doke have a nice night sleep tight I've got work in like four hours.

is... is this really you're most intelligent exit response

disagree with someone =/= trolling, right? isn't that something you said a month or two ago?

[Red Spy]

how would people sending their kids to private school benefit from it? is not having to pay an additional cent in taxes considered a benefit?

Well after all I'm an evil Republican who wants to benefit the top one percent

[PhantOS]

Well after all I'm an evil Republican who wants to benefit the top one percent

cmon red please, i'm asking a serious question

[IkeTheGeneric]

Oh great, more superfluous budgetary cuts that only end up harming poor families.

[Red Spy]

cmon red please, i'm asking a serious question

Hate to break it to you Path but most Republicans are middle class so this whole "They just wanna help the one percent" (which is actually just 400k and up) sorta falls apart in your hands here. Not to mention the party that wants a smaller government also wants to help the government...?
I honesty don't think you know anything about right wing policies other than "they suck xd"
This isn't a good time to talk about how the right sucks even though the worst cities in the nation have been run by Dems for the past 40 years, which I'm guessing is where this bill will have the worst effect, you don't thing this is going to hurt LA lol? And of course this is all assuming the bill won't die on the house floor like the other 97% of bills

[PhantOS]

Hate to break it to you Path but most Republicans are middle class so this whole "They just wanna help the one percent" (which is actually just 400k and up) sorta falls apart in your hands here. Not to mention the party that wants a smaller government also wants to help the government...?
I honesty don't think you know anything about right wing policies other than "they suck xd"
This isn't a good time to talk about how the right sucks even though the worst cities in the nation have been run by Dems for the past 40 years, which I'm guessing is where this bill will have the worst effect, you don't thing this is going to hurt LA lol? And of course this is all assuming the bill won't die on the house floor like the other 97% of bills

my question goes unanswered: who benefits from this bill?

[Red Spy]

my question goes unanswered: who benefits from this bill?

You tell me

[Nonnel]

Hate to break it to you Path but most Republicans are middle class so this whole "They just wanna help the one percent" (which is actually just 400k and up) sorta falls apart in your hands here.

obviously most republicans are not part of the 1%, but they are the ones who want to cut regulations and allow corporations to have more pull in government (PACs/corporate donations and corporate lobbying under free speech,) and that the major corporations that would then have more power are owned by the richest 1%