Author Topic: Habitual problem user "patton360/Grimlock" gets banned, comes back with new alt  (Read 84875 times)

GRIMLOCK HAS BEEN BANNED
https://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=311441.msg9586582#msg9586582
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
ok that ban is forgetin bullstuff.
yeah the best and we do want him banned but banned for wishing a happy birthday to a banned user? for real?
that's cold, Badspot

ok that ban is forgetin bullstuff.
yeah the best and we do want him banned but banned for wishing a happy birthday to a banned user? for real?
that's cold, Badspot

he posted for betel

still, by posting a simple happy birthday from another BoS user he gets banned?

still, by posting a simple happy birthday from another BoS user he gets banned?

yes. posting on behalf of a banned user is against the rules.

who'd get mad if it happened to someone they like
well yeah? i mean it's pretty hard to like patton lol so I'm not mad

Im against it because im not an authoritarianist who wants people i dont like removed from places
i'd argue that it's way more than just not liking him. if that person has been banned before for flaming and continues to flame and post stupid stuff, then there's already a problem here. someone who just creeps around discords/forums all day just to be a nuisance and to harass people is not someone I'd want around anyway.

i'd bet grimlock gets at least 1-2 reports on his posts a day:
Patton are you serious with this thread?  Do you know how many people have reported your bullstuff in the past month?  Now you're crying about someone saying "lol"?

the fact of the matter here is that he was banned and I can't say that I've ever seen badspot ban somebody for absolutely no reason.

Wasn't the point of Grimlock's topic to celebrate Ravencroft's brithday? So would that mean that he was posting for him, or was it literally just the quote from Betelgeuse that got him banned?

Or would it have been both? I'm confused...

They are both ban on site users meaning he is still posting for them. I'm guessing the Betel quote was the main focus of the ban but still Raven is a ban on site so I'm assuming both took a toll in it.

well yeah? i mean it's pretty hard to like patton lol so I'm not mad

yeah forget consistency c'mon haha

Wasn't the point of Grimlock's topic to celebrate Ravencroft's brithday? So would that mean that he was posting for him, or was it literally just the quote from Betelgeuse that got him banned?

Or would it have been both? I'm confused...

the betel quote was probably the part that did him in, i don't think saying happy birthday to a banned user does anything unless he specifically posted something for him

Unfortunately, I don't think it's permanent.

Maybe that's for the best though, because I certainly wouldn't want a sperg like him creeping on everybody in real life.

yes. posting on behalf of a banned user is against the rules.
neonfallout did the same stuff and got nothing for it
i understand grimlock has broken the rules but still, thats loving handicapped

neonfallout didn't quote anything from a bos'd person though that wanted to be said in the forums torin


neonfallout did the same stuff and got nothing for it
i understand grimlock has broken the rules but still, thats loving handicapped

i was going to agree with you that it was unfair but i looked at the thread and neon never wrote on his behalf, she broke no rules.
patton clearly posted a message from betelgeuse.

his ban was a stretch but if you're a repeat offender you should be be on a tighter leash, and that's what happened.

neonfallout didn't quote anything from a bos'd person though that wanted to be said in the forums torin


i was going to agree with you that it was unfair but i looked at the thread and neon never wrote on his behalf, she broke no rules.
patton clearly posted a message from betelgeuse.

his ban was a stretch but if you're a repeat offender you should be be on a tighter leash, and that's what happened.
ya alright

just in case my above msg sounded sarcastic to any1 i was agreeing with steve and kott

I really wish Grim was BoS at this point. The fact every time he gets banned and comes back to say "autism unleashed" or go out on a person like 5 years younger than him is absolutely pathetic.