Mister Metokur takes on Channel Awesome | Episode 7 - FINALE

[Karl Marx]

There's a massive difference in Badspot deciding to be "clever" by banning me to accentuate his political opinion and a dude deleting all traces of his already anonymous online identity to escape criticism for doing degenerate bullstuff, only to come crawling back to the same exact audience that's more than willing to eat up whatever slop he puts out.

[Ad Bot]

[Ragequit]

also i hope im not the only person who finds the "talk about an issue over an image of myself/some representation of myself" super pretentious. its really loving pretentious

its just a background picture ya forgetin vag

[Tactical Nuke]

There's a massive difference in Badspot deciding to be "clever" by banning me to accentuate his political opinion and a dude deleting all traces of his already anonymous online identity to escape criticism for doing degenerate bullstuff, only to come crawling back to the same exact audience that's more than willing to eat up whatever slop he puts out.

there's also a massive difference between Badspot deciding to be "clever" by banning you to accentuate his political opinion and him banning you for being a hypocritical stuffhead

[torin²]

There's a massive difference in Badspot deciding to be "clever" by banning me to accentuate his political opinion and a dude deleting all traces of his already anonymous online identity to escape criticism for doing degenerate bullstuff, only to come crawling back to the same exact audience that's more than willing to eat up whatever slop he puts out.

kek U mad bro

[Karl Marx]

there's also a massive difference between Badspot deciding to be "clever" by banning you to accentuate his political opinion and him banning you for being a hypocritical stuffhead

Explain how I was being "hypocritical." Because I was making fun of poor old Richard Spencer?

kek U mad bro

Delete This Post Right Now.

[Deus Ex]

also i hope im not the only person who finds the "talk about an issue over an image of myself/some representation of myself" super pretentious. its really loving pretentious

That is what literally every single youtuber that makes videos like him does, I don't see how it's pretentious at all but oooooookay

[Tactical Nuke]

Explain how I was being "hypocritical." Because I was making fun of poor old Richard Spencer?

I shouldn't say hypocritical but it is rich that you advocated that private businesses discriminate against people with different political beliefs and then Badspot bans you for exactly that and you come crawling back with your poliwhirl tail between your legs harboring contempt for him

[Karl Marx]

I shouldn't say hypocritical but it is rich that you advocated that private businesses discriminate against people with different political beliefs and then Badspot bans you for exactly that and you come crawling back with your poliwhirl tail between your legs harboring contempt for him

Imagine writing this post and thinking it sounded cool.

 Also poliwhirl doesn't have a tail.

[Tactical Nuke]

Imagine writing this post and thinking it sounded cool.

it's better than anything you pump out on a daily basis

speaking of, nice comeback, made you feel cool, didn't it?

Also poliwhirl doesn't have a tail.

don't care

[Køtt]

can someone run me through what the hell is going on here? dont tell me to watch the videos in the op because i still dont understand the context

he's criticizing some of the members of That Guy With The Glasses

[PhantOS]

That is what literally every single youtuber that makes videos like him does, I don't see how it's pretentious at all but oooooookay

idk maybe its just me sorry.

i kind of get a little bit angry whenever i see those share your opinion in a really calm voice with pauses in between sentences while you look at a visual representation of me. if you're going to be going out on a limb and sharing opinions at least be aggressive and visually impressive like paul joseph watson

[Deus Ex]

idk maybe its just me sorry.

i kind of get a little bit angry whenever i see those share your opinion in a really calm voice with pauses in between sentences while you look at a visual representation of me. if you're going to be going out on a limb and sharing opinions at least be aggressive and visually impressive like paul joseph watson

I can see what you're saying, but I think a lot of people do it because the things they say would get them stuffcanned irl. Paul Joseph Watson is employed by cnn, who wouldn't give a stuff if he says the things he does and supports that, but most companies are apolitical and would just fire someone to avoid the stuffstorm if it came out they were employing people like Bearing or Metokur.

[Køtt]

i kind of get a little bit angry whenever i see those share your opinion in a really calm voice with pauses in between sentences while you look at a visual representation of me. if you're going to be going out on a limb and sharing opinions at least be aggressive and visually impressive like paul joseph watson

i mean he did start off a 100k channel, he can and will eventually improve more on his videos

i think he's just trying to get the audience to focus on his words and what he says more than anything visual. you have seen him read full paragraphs and comments before so he is a reader, but yeah, he can be able to throw in more work if he wants to surprise people.

that's why i like people like chris ray gun, he is a bit of a reader but sometimes he impresses and entertains people with his funny effects.

[Tactical Nuke]

back on topic, I feel like the one big thing angry joe can do to communicate to his audience his workload is to create an angry review and follow it up with an after-review stream like zero punctuation and a "behind-the-scenes" video showing how he makes his angry reviews

if that's too personal I get it but he should show his workload rather than rant about it

[Køtt]

nuke you don't understand


it took him 4 HOURS to rant on those fans