Author Topic: Liberals try going to muslim no go zones to prove Annoying Orange wrong.  (Read 5779 times)

The whole idea of differentiating love and gender is a very new thing for a lot of people.

Mostly because the guy who coined the term gender was a psychopath who performed horrible experiments on children, both of which committed Self Delete and the experiments turned out to be a complete failure which worked against the concept of gender instead of proving it.

Mostly because the guy who coined the term gender was a psychopath who performed horrible experiments on children, both of which committed Self Delete and the experiments turned out to be a complete failure which worked against the concept of gender instead of proving it.
What do you want me to infer from this information? lol

let me trust snopes, the "think tank" that just recently got it wrong with Bill Nye's "gender spectrum" contradiction
they didn't get wrong at all, though, the show said nothing about gender. only love. i don't think anyone has ever argued that love is not determined by your chromosomes, because they would be wrong.

they didn't get wrong at all, though, the show said nothing about gender. only love.

Oh so they didn't get it wrong because he said love, not gender!


Did you seriously see what you just wrote? Yeah, did you? This is what snopes loving does. They claim stuff is false and then they word it specifically so they are technically right about claiming it "false."

So on the internet. people are claiming that Bill Nye's old episode about gender was censored. Snopes says this is wrong, it never happened. How do they justify this? They claim he specifically said love not gender. So by one word, one loving word they claim this censorship was false out of a technicality. Snopes is right, for the wrong reason.


Also let's forget the fact that in the 90s love and gender were considered to be the exact same loving thing, if you want to get technical that is.

Also let's forget the fact that in the 90s love and gender were considered to be the exact same loving thing, if you want to get technical that is.
So what? Are you saying that what was believed in the past should always override what is believed today?

Most snopes articles have been purposely misleading statements for awhile now.

They also claim rumors or speculation are false too. They shouldn't even be allowed to even comment on rumors or speculation until legit evidence is brought to surface.



For example:

Snopes has the nerve to say Clinton's body count is false. The clinton body count is a rumor/speculation and or conspiracy theory. Yes there is no valid evidence directly linking the Clintons responsible but that doesn't mean it could be false.

How does Snopes specifically know that a few unsolved cases are false? They don't.

What they should do is claim that the rumor and or speculation is inconclusive.

So what? Are you saying that what was believed in the past should always override what is believed today?

I like how you totally skipped the point. Went straight for this.

Also top scientists still claim love and gender are the exact same thing.

love and gender being different is not a fact.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2017, 06:51:51 AM by King Tøny »

It also is still believed today that love and gender are the same thing.
By special needs people like yourself, sure. The vast majority (if not all) universities will teach that they are two distinct things.

universities will teach that they are two distinct things.

This isn't helping your case.  Did you get this from Berkley university? lol

This isn't helping your case.
And being part of the anti-intellectualism crowd isn't helping yours. Did you learn that at Walmart?

Do these universities happen to be left-wing universities?

If you can find universities that aren't left-wing that teach this same style of thinking then let me know.

Do these universities happen to be left-wing universities?

If you can find universities that aren't left-wing that teach this same style of thinking then let me know.
Are walmart employees mainly right wing anti intellectuals like yourself?

Now you're just side-stepping the argument to petty insults. I asked you to find me a university that isn't left-wing.

You want an intellectual conversation and all you're doing is throwing petty insults.

Most snopes articles have been purposely misleading statements for awhile now.
Snopes has been the defining authority on bullstuff-spread-over-the-internet for the better part of a decade now. The only reason anyone criticizes them nowadays is because   of the sheer volume of political bullstuff that has spread in the past year.

Now you're just side-stepping the argument to petty insults. I asked you to find me a university that isn't left-wing.
My university has a long history of being apolitical and yet we still have a couple of elective classes that teach gender theory.

Now you're just side-stepping the argument to petty insults.
But you did work at walmart and you are a right wing anti-intellectual. Fair question I'd say