Author Topic: Verification - harassment and slander.  (Read 22948 times)

< 2 small paragraphs
< crudely brown townytical


???

Everything you say is worded really strangely and drones on way too long, focusing on too many unimportant details. You could have made your point within one sentence without sounding like an alien trying to impersonate an english-speaking human

No, I couldn't shorten it in one sentence. Those two paragraphs had all the important details. Sorry for wanting to elaborate a little so nobody is confused later. God damn.

Where did you get the idea of "crudely brown townytical" anyway? Sounds like what an illiterate who cannot stand reading or writing more than one sentence would say.

Okay, let me just get to the point of "Tommy". Tony (or King Tony, as he crowned himself) just isn't so remarkable or memorable anymore. He has screwed up in every way possible. He has completed a troll's life 100%, obtained all coins, secrets and stars, so to speak.

"Tommy" is an intentional misspell because I feel like I'm slowly forgetting the name "Lord Tony" because it has gone stale and typical. I cannot even laugh or be mad about something he says anymore. The last instance of that is when I said "Tony has a boo boo", and that was the last reaction I could pull off.

It's weird but it's true.
No, I couldn't shorten it in one sentence. Those two paragraphs had all the important details. Sorry for wanting to elaborate a little so nobody is confused later. God damn.

Where did you get the idea of "crudely brown townytical" anyway? Sounds like what an illiterate who cannot stand reading or writing more than one sentence would say.

Quote
Location:   Greece

Maybe you should accept that you don't know as much about English as you think you do. I'm gonna modify your post for clarity and I'm also going to cut out all the parts that don't need to be there. Contrary to what you think, length doesn't make you sound smarter. You'll actually sound less intelligent if you misuse the language.

Tony just isn't so remarkable or memorable anymore. He has screwed up in every way possible. "Tommy" is an intentional misspell because I feel like I'm slowly forgetting the name "Lord Tony" because it has gone stale. I cannot even laugh or be mad about something he says anymore.

It's weird but it's true.

It's generally better to be succinct than verbose online, especially when you're just rambling about some dude you don't like.

Sounds like what an illiterate who cannot stand reading or writing more than one sentence would say.

Maybe you're just not so great at writing posts as you think you are.

marios is actually autistic
so like
youre arguing with a 15 y/o autistic kid here


Maybe you should accept that you don't know as much about English as you think you do.

Did I ever deny it? I am well aware I'm a foreigner.

Contrary to what you think, length doesn't make you sound smarter.

Did I ever say this? You seem to be putting words into my mouth. I never ever thought length means intelligence.

I've spoken in only a single sentence (or two) plenty of times in recent times.

Wait, what, really? Ohhh. I thought Nonnel was referring to torin and not Matthew, sorry for the confusion.

Done. Due to differing grade system, however, the GPA I input may be inaccurate. But hopefully it fits in the range I chose.

There I am, Gary!

On a more serious note, anything after "Oh, ", as long as its all caps, gets the entire sentence considered all caps.

"Oh, OK" gives you an all caps warning as well.

I could swear those two are the same thing but a different model... Oops... Sorry about that.

Anyway this looks like a must-have for a deathmatch with indoor areas.

(And also this but it's unquotable right now)

It's generally better to be succinct than verbose online, especially when you're just rambling about some dude you don't like.

Rambling about what dude now? I do believe you're misunderstanding me.

Anyway, your shortened version of my post doesn't check out too well. The removal of my metaphor I suppose is right if it was too subtle for your taste but the rest of the post sounds like me stating random, unconnected things.

In particular, the second-to-last sentence. That just suddenly springs up after me just saying "tony has gone stale". It needs context.



Now if you don't mind me "making long posts to sound smart", as you claim, could I explain why I wrote those two paragraphs in one long phrase: Context. Those topics needed a little context at the time, so I just wrote more than just one unexplained enigmatic sentence. That's all.


"OP is an starfish, therefore entire drama is null and void!!!!1!1!!1!!!1!1!1!11!!!"

Didn't we already conclude to take everything marios says with a grain of salt?


The forget are you doing Marios lol

Didn't we already conclude to take everything marios says with a grain of salt?

When?

When?

Literally the last few times you've sperged, and the times before those?

Anyway, your shortened version of my post doesn't check out too well. The removal of my metaphor I suppose is right if it was too subtle for your taste but the rest of the post sounds like me stating random, unconnected things.

No, his fix was perfect.  It makes complete sense without being too verbose.

In particular, the second-to-last sentence. That just suddenly springs up after me just saying "tony has gone stale". It needs context.
Now if you don't mind me "making long posts to sound smart", as you claim, could I explain why I wrote those two paragraphs in one long phrase: Context. Those topics needed a little context at the time

It doesn't need context lol

The idea is that you're slowly forgetting his name because he's done the same stuff so much that he's become stale and unremarkable to you.  He can't even get an emotional response out of you anymore.

You don't need two paragraphs to explain that idea; I just did it in two sentences.